External links & archives

[James Gannon]

Proofpoint email links are actually an antivirus scanning/antiphising setup, so while I agree its not great and readable they are pretty safe.

-James

From: NCSG-Discuss <NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU<mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>> on behalf of Ayden Férdeline <icann at FERDELINE.COM<mailto:icann at FERDELINE.COM>>
Reply-To: Ayden Férdeline <icann at FERDELINE.COM<mailto:icann at FERDELINE.COM>>
Date: Thursday 2 February 2017 at 13:43
To: "NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU<mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>" <NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU<mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>>
Subject: External links & archives

I really dislike this masking of hyperlinks when we receive an email from ICANN staff now. When I read email archives, I can't see the real URL to ascertain at a glance what I am really clicking on, and must trust it will take me to the ICANN website. I rarely click on every hyperlink in an email, as I can see from the URL whether it is an announcement, a PDF, taking me to the wiki, or somewhere else. Now I am often left to click all the links to try to find the relevant material. This is a but a small inconvenience, and not my biggest concern. What I worry about is how we archive these links. In five or ten years time, will "urldefense.proofpoint.com" plus the string of 200 or so random characters still redirect to the linked content? We don't need these third party redirects, it does not make us any safer, and it feels very much us vs. them. Is it possible that we can get some meaningful assurances from ICANN staff that these masked links will redirect to the correct URLs in perpetuity? Thanks

Ayden Férdeline
linkedin.com/in/ferdeline<http://www.linkedin.com/in/ferdeline>


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20170202/93a724a4/attachment.htm>