My first meeting with the nominating committee at ICANN

[Stephanie Perrin]

I agree.  I would add that it is a good improvement that they are doing 
this outreach.  We should work on that profile they suggested.

Stephanie Perrin


On 2017-12-10 10:54, Kathy Kleiman wrote:
>
> Hi Farzi,
>
> I think you hit the nail on the head in terms of the points that you 
> made and our priorities for the next year (and probably far beyond).  
> Tx for your leadership!
>
> Best, Kathy
>
> On 12/7/2017 1:50 PM, farzaneh badii wrote:
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I had my first meeting with NomCom as the NCSG chair.
>>
>> The Nominating Committee selects 8 members of ICANN board + some key 
>> positions at ICANN, namely to NomCom Appointees to GNSO Council. Here 
>> you can read more about it. 
>> https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/nomcom-2013-12-13-en
>>
>> I didn't know what they were going to ask so I did not consult with 
>> you about the meeting. The gist of it was that they wanted to get to 
>> know us as a stakeholder group better and wanted to understand what 
>> our values are.
>>
>> Here are some of the points I made:
>>
>> They asked what we are looking for in a leader. I said we need 
>> transparent communication, openness, we need them to be committed and 
>> have a strong tie with the community and be passionate.
>>
>> They also asked what we think our priorities for the next year will 
>> be. This is the list some of the issues that I said are important for 
>> me personally and I think they are on our many of our members agenda 
>> too, but we can discuss later :
>>
>> 1. "privacy protection"
>> 2. "rights protection mechanism and preventing trademark overreach"
>> 3. "Clarifying and narrowing the definition of DNS abuse"
>> 4. "Making sure the work stream 2 recommendations are implemented" 
>> (go here for the 
>> recommendations: https://community.icann.org/display/WEIA/WS2+-+Enhancing+ICANN+Accountability+Home 
>> <https://community.icann.org/display/WEIA/WS2+-+Enhancing+ICANN+Accountability+Home>
>> Not yet finalized)
>> 5. "preventing governmental and trademark overreach in generic domain 
>> name policy"
>>
>>
>>  They also asked what do we want the leaders advocate for (it was not 
>> framed exactly like that, nomcom is an independent committee  and 
>> cannot just choose an advocate based on what we say but they wanted 
>> to know what we care about)
>>
>> I said, for GNSO positions I believe it should be someone who is 
>> active at GNSO preferably and not an outsider, does not have 
>> governmental ties and truly cares about the GNSO and its policies.
>>
>> Some from nomcom told me that it is advisable to create a profile 
>> about our ideal candidates so that nomcom understands our needs.
>>
>> They also want to be in touch so I said we could invite them to NCSG 
>> meeting in PR.
>>
>> Best
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Farzaneh
>> -- 
>> Farzaneh
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20171211/16079614/attachment.htm>