My first meeting with the nominating committee at ICANN
Ayden Férdeline
icann at FERDELINE.COM
Fri Dec 8 18:37:12 EET 2017
Farzaneh, thanks-
I think you touched on something very important. I think we do need to develop our own profile of our ideal candidate in order to assist the NomCom in finding people who can faithfully represent the diverse interests and communities of the GNSO. As a starting point we might turn to some of the documents that ISOC has produced in relation to its recent call for nominations for its Board of Trustees to get a sense of what qualifications they consider to be highly desirable.
But, this is only useful if the information reaches the NomCom. Please correct me if I am wrong, but one of the recent issues which the ccNSO had with the NomCom was they appointed an individual [contravening long-standing guidance](https://ccnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/field-attached/sataki-to-nomcomm-29sep17-en.pdf) issued by the ccNSO. This was unfair on the candidate who was rejected. And from what I understand, it happened because the NomCom hadn't done their homework and reviewed the advice received on their evaluation criteria.
It is hard to know how true this is, because a lot of what the NomCom does happens behind closed doors, but given how the NomCom is presently structured (turnover of representatives by design) it has to be hard to build up institutional knowledge. I think the onus is on us to be communicating to the NomCom every year what we'd like to see in their slate of candidates. Those attributes are another conversation altogether, and broadly I agree with you that they are transparent communication, openness, commitment, passion, and strong community ties. However, I would also suggest the addition of "integrity" and "good judgement".
I wonder if this might be something we should discuss with our colleagues in the CSG at the Intersessional [and also amongst ourselves]?
Best wishes,
Ayden Férdeline
[linkedin.com/in/ferdeline](http://www.linkedin.com/in/ferdeline)
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: My first meeting with the nominating committee at ICANN
> Local Time: 7 December 2017 6:50 PM
> UTC Time: 7 December 2017 18:50
> From: farzaneh.badii at GMAIL.COM
> To: NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
>
> Dear all,
>
> I had my first meeting with NomCom as the NCSG chair.
>
> The Nominating Committee selects 8 members of ICANN board + some key positions at ICANN, namely to NomCom Appointees to GNSO Council. Here you can read more about it. https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/nomcom-2013-12-13-en
>
> I didn't know what they were going to ask so I did not consult with you about the meeting. The gist of it was that they wanted to get to know us as a stakeholder group better and wanted to understand what our values are.
>
> Here are some of the points I made:
>
> They asked what we are looking for in a leader. I said we need transparent communication, openness, we need them to be committed and have a strong tie with the community and be passionate.
>
> They also asked what we think our priorities for the next year will be. This is the list some of the issues that I said are important for me personally and I think they are on our many of our members agenda too, but we can discuss later :
>
> 1. "privacy protection"
> 2. "rights protection mechanism and preventing trademark overreach"
> 3. "Clarifying and narrowing the definition of DNS abuse"
> 4. "Making sure the work stream 2 recommendations are implemented" (go here for the recommendations:[ https://community.icann.org/display/WEIA/WS2+-+Enhancing+ICANN+Accountability+Home](https://community.icann.org/display/WEIA/WS2+-+Enhancing+ICANN+Accountability+Home)
> Not yet finalized)
> 5. "preventing governmental and trademark overreach in generic domain name policy"
>
> They also asked what do we want the leaders advocate for (it was not framed exactly like that, nomcom is an independent committee and cannot just choose an advocate based on what we say but they wanted to know what we care about)
>
> I said, for GNSO positions I believe it should be someone who is active at GNSO preferably and not an outsider, does not have governmental ties and truly cares about the GNSO and its policies.
>
> Some from nomcom told me that it is advisable to create a profile about our ideal candidates so that nomcom understands our needs.
>
> They also want to be in touch so I said we could invite them to NCSG meeting in PR.
>
> Best
>
> Farzaneh
> --
> Farzaneh
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20171208/ff6eca73/attachment.htm>
More information about the Ncsg-discuss
mailing list