[Public Comments] Proposed Dates for ICANN Public Meetings 2021 –2023

[Michael Oghia]

Of course Ayden, and those are good points too.

-Michael

On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 11:57 AM, Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com>
wrote:

> Hi Michael,
>
> That's a good point, and I do acknowledge that overlap. However I think
> the Address Supporting Organization will be reviewing the proposed dates to
> ensure there are no conflicts on their end. I'm not sure anyone else is
> looking out for conflicts with civil society-orientated events, so I think
> we should prioritise this. But of course I'll roll with the consensus
> opinion as to which dates we should ourselves be reviewing.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Ayden Férdeline
> linkedin.com/in/ferdeline <http://www.linkedin.com/in/ferdeline>
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [Public Comments] Proposed Dates for ICANN Public Meetings
> 2021–2023
> Local Time: 27 August 2017 10:19 AM
> UTC Time: 27 August 2017 09:19
> From: mike.oghia at gmail.com
> To: Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com>
> NCSG <NCSG-DISCUSS at listserv.syr.edu>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 5:55 PM, Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com>
> wrote:
>
> Secondly, there are national and regional events where our members are
>> active. I would not want an ICANN meeting to conflict with a regional IGF,
>> though I would be more indifferent to an ICANN meeting conflicting with,
>> say, an RIR meeting (though it seems unlikely to me that this would occur).
>>
>
> N.B.: RIR dates are important since there is much overlap between the
> individuals involved with the technical work of ICANN and the RIR
> communities.
>
> -Michael
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20170827/7d34094b/attachment.htm>