question to the candiates

[Tatiana Tropina]

Niels and all,
I agree with Martin on this. I had some troubles understanding your
question. There are plenty of things that make us all unique but at the end
it's shared values that bring us here at NCSG.
I would also have to make up the response to your question as I have to
have a deep knowledge of other candidates to claim my uniqueness.
Warm regards,
Tatiana

On Fri 25. Aug 2017 at 15:34, Martin Pablo Silva Valent <
mpsilvavalent at gmail.com> wrote:

> Niels,
> If you are talking about what makes my position on public safety unique, I
> would have to know more in deep other's positions. I’m guessing if we all
> dig enough we are going to find different points of view, but since we all
> share a common intuition is hard to guess my uniqueness from them. I would
> have to force or guess a difference.
> Or you were asking: ¿what makes us different from other councilors?
>
> Cheers,
> Martín
>
> On Aug 25, 2017, at 5:48 AM, Ayden Férdeline <icann at FERDELINE.COM> wrote:
>
> Hi Niels,
>
> I consider my positions on the issues at the core of what the NCSG
> advocates for – supporting a Domain Name System that is innovative,
> protects the global public sphere, and is reliable – to be normative and
> consistent with the positions that the NCSG and its constituencies have
> taken since inception. To the best of my knowledge I have not taken any
> positions which are fundamentally inconsistent with the NCSG's principles
> or mission.
>
> However, outside of our core activities, there is one area where it is
> possible my views diverge from some other members. I tend to see things in
> transactional terms, so my position on the value of some ICANN-funded
> programmes could be influenced by what return on investment I see being
> generated. I would find it difficult to continue supporting a programme
> where I thought metrics were either lacking or revealing no justifiable
> return. Now whether, as a GNSO Councillor, I would have any involvement in
> determining the future of such programmes, is quite another question.
>
> I hope this answers your question, Niels. As always, I am happy to expand
> upon my remarks or to answer any other questions.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Ayden Férdeline
> Sent from ProtonMail Mobile
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 5:40 pm, Niels ten Oever <
> lists at DIGITALDISSIDENTS.ORG> wrote:
>
> Thank you very much candidates for your statements! All very eloquent and
> spot on at the same time. The fact that the opinions are also converging
> gives a lot of trust in this team. This do beckons me to ask a follow-up
> question: Where is your position is most divergent from the other
> candidates? In other words: what makes you different? Not in terms of
> style, but in terms of content. Thanks again very much in advance to the
> candidates. Best, Niels On 08/23/2017 11:59 PM, Mike wrote: > Hi, > > I'm
> just traveling at the moment, and without access to my laptop, so I'll just
> give some quick thoughts. > > I think that public safety is best guaranteed
> through a robust and reliable global DNS, including reliable expectations
> of privacy, security, etc. It always chaffs me a bit when people talk about
> the traditional trade-offs between privacy and public safety, as that
> ignores the enormous overlap between the two, and the fact that
> technologies which guarantee personal privacy are also vital to our
> collective security - guaranteeing a free press, secure financial
> transactions, etc. > > Bringing this back to ICANN, I would be very
> uncomfortable with any sort of cooperative relationship between ICANN and
> law enforcement or security agencies, beyond an educational role in sharing
> info about what ICANN is about, or something like that. ICANN should do
> only what it is legally compelled to do, and even that should be carried
> out with maximum transparency, and with appropriate resistance (appeals) if
> confronted with overbroad or unreasonable demands. > > TL/DR Come back with
> a warrant. > > Michael Karanicolas > > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Aug
> 21, 2017, at 4:04 PM, Niels ten Oever wrote: >> >> Dear candidates, >> >>
> Would you be so kind to tell us what you think ICANN's role is vis a vis >>
> public safety? >> >> Thanks in advance, >> >> Niels >> -- >> Niels ten
> Oever >> Head of Digital >> >> Article 19 >> www.article19.org >> >> PGP
> fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4 >> 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9 -- Niels
> ten Oever Head of Digital Article 19 www.article19.org PGP fingerprint
> 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20170825/89407af4/attachment.htm>