Topics for meeting with the board in Hyderabad?

[matthew shears]

Thanks James

Anyone know if thee was a recording or something of this event. How come 
it seems that there is very little info sharing on this eventual WG?  
Don't we have reps?

Matthew


On 19/10/2016 18:09, James Gannon wrote:
> https://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg19277.html
>
> _Looks like that CCWG is kicking __off soon._
>
> From: NCSG-Discuss <NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU 
> <mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>> on behalf of Ayden Férdeline 
> <icann at FERDELINE.COM <mailto:icann at FERDELINE.COM>>
> Reply-To: Ayden Férdeline <icann at FERDELINE.COM 
> <mailto:icann at FERDELINE.COM>>
> Date: Wednesday 19 October 2016 at 18:06
> To: "NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU 
> <mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>" <NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU 
> <mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>>
> Subject: Re: Topics for meeting with the board in Hyderabad?
>
> Hi all,
>
> I agree with Bill that we should try to blend questions 1 and 3 
> together. I would also like to know how the Board envisions the new 
> gTLD contention set auction proceeds being spent... There's now US$240 
> million "reserved and earmarked until the Board determines a plan for 
> the appropriate use of the funds through consultation with the 
> community". So what's the plan, I wonder? We've been talking about a 
> charter for a CCWG on this topic since at least the Marrakech meeting, 
> maybe longer... There's a lot of cash in there now - would be great to 
> know at a high level how new Board members envision it being allocated.
>
> Ayden
>
>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: Re: Topics for meeting with the board in Hyderabad?
>> Local Time: 19 October 2016 5:12 PM
>> UTC Time: 19 October 2016 16:12
>> From: wjdrake at GMAIL.COM <mailto:wjdrake at GMAIL.COM>
>> To: NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU <mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> You might consider combining 1 and 3 somehow, otherwise 2 of our 3 
>> topics are focused on nailing the same person, who they’re doubling 
>> down on. Could be awkward and set teeth on edge.
>>
>> Another option would be to ask about Goran’s “new narrative” that 
>> he’ll have rolled out by, ask about costs/benefits of a tripartite 
>> community/board/organization formulation….
>>
>> Bill
>>
>> > On Oct 19, 2016, at 17:29, Mueller, Milton L <milton at gatech.edu <mailto:milton at gatech.edu>> wrote:
>> >
>> > 1. The new "complaint" system, which puts ICANN's lawyer (whose job is to protect the corporation from 
>> complainers whether they are right or wrong) in charge of managing 
>> complaints. Also affects the independence of the Ombudsman in unclear 
>> ways
>> >
>> > 2. The "small group" that is trying to develop policy for IGO names outside of ICANN's bottom up and representative 
>> policy processes.
>> >
>> > 3. Why there were no repercussions for the abuses of TLD evaluation procedures in the Dot Registry case. 
>> Indeed, the person responsible seems to have been promoted.
>> >
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: NCSG-Discuss [mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU] On Behalf
>> >> Of Tapani Tarvainen
>> >> Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2016 8:30 AM
>> >> To:NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU <mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>
>> >> Subject: Topics for meeting with the board in Hyderabad?
>> >>
>> >> Dear all,
>> >>
>> >> As usual the board wants in advance topics or questions for our meeting with
>> >> them in Hyderabad.
>> >>
>> >> Suggestions?
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Tapani Tarvainen
>

-- 
--------------
Matthew Shears
Global Internet Policy and Human Rights
Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT)
+ 44 771 2472987



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20161019/f4d19adc/attachment.htm>