A reminder on IANA Strwardship
Ayden Férdeline
icann at FERDELINE.COM
Thu May 26 04:06:41 EEST 2016
Thanks for sharing this, James.
I'm a little surprised that Strickling would note on the record, even if true,
that “we don’t provide any oversight of the policy judgments that ICANN and the
multistakeholder community make”. If I was on the Senate Committee, I might
wonder just what the NTIA had been doing and why they were traveling around the
world on the taxpayers' dime if they have no sway?
That being said, Strickling did offer a brilliant and succinct explanation of
why the transition not proceeding would harm Internet freedom. Good to be
reminded of why the transition matters.
Ayden
On Thu, May 26, 2016 8:23 AM, William Drake wjdrake at GMAIL.COM wrote:
A memorable performance
On May 26, 2016, at 09:05, James Gannon < james at cyberinvasion.net > wrote:
Just came across this again this morning, a poignant reminder of why we are all
here and what we have been working for over the past 2 years. And why we
shouldn’t stumble at the finish line. In defence of the IANA Stewardship Transition… https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZIrs8n5Q7Yo
-James
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20160526/a60dbfa7/attachment.htm>
More information about the Ncsg-discuss
mailing list