[PC-NCSG] Public comment period on RDAP closing 18/03

[Desiree Miloshevic]

I endorsed IAB statement since we may all end up there in the end.
While the IAB suggests differentiated access regarding data exposure, I do find that
google's comment too is worth supporting, e.g.  not to offer public access to the data.

>>> http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-rdap-profile-03dec15/pdfXEuYViKmu4.pdf

The overarching principle is minimisation, and to set aside the RDAP and let registries/registrars
deploy them on experimental basis and let the Next Gen PDP WG develop the rest.

So perhaps a little bit more nuances before just endorsing (differentiated) access to the data immediately?
Others may have spent more time on this issue and may know better...

Desiree
--

On 18 Mar 2016, at 11:48, Amr Elsadr <aelsadr at EGYPTIG.ORG> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I think it’s a great comment, and support the NCSG endorsing it.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Amr
> 
>> On Mar 18, 2016, at 11:12 AM, Marilia Maciel <mariliamaciel at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Thanks, Wendy. Others? Just reminding everyone that the deadline is today, 23:59 UTC.
>> Best wishes
>> M
>> 
>> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 6:05 AM, Wendy Seltzer <wendy at seltzer.com> wrote:
>> I support endorsing the IAB comment.
>> 
>> --Wendy
>> 
>> On 03/17/2016 01:53 PM, Marilia Maciel wrote:
>>> Hi James, thanks for the clarifications you provided.
>>> 
>>> Based on this information and considering the little time we have, the
>>> question seems to be: should NCSG endorse IAB's comment on RDAP? It would
>>> be great if our members, specially those in our policy committee, could
>>> share their views on the next hours.
>>> 
>>> Thanks!
>>> Marília
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 5:24 AM, Shane Kerr <shane at time-travellers.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> All,
>>>> 
>>>> At 2016-03-17 09:22:34 +0100
>>>> Shane Kerr <shane at time-travellers.org> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> I'm not sure the NCUC necessarily needs to have an opinion about the
>>>>> technology itself, and can happily wait and weigh in on the parts that
>>>>> matter to us.
>>>> 
>>>> Of course I meant NCSG. I blame decaffeinated coffee.
>>>> 
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Shane
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Wendy Seltzer -- wendy at seltzer.org
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Marília Maciel
>> Pesquisadora Gestora - Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade - FGV Direito Rio
>> Researcher and Coordinator - Center for Technology & Society - FGV Law School
>> http://direitorio.fgv.br/cts
>> DiploFoundation associate - www.diplomacy.edu
>> PoliTICs Magazine Advisory Committee - http://www.politics.org.br/
>> 
>> 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 495 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20160318/adfee9e5/attachment.sig>