[PC-NCSG] Public comment period on RDAP closing 18/03

[Desiree]

+1

Desiree
--
On 18 Mar 2016, at 09:05, Wendy Seltzer <wendy at SELTZER.COM> wrote:

> I support endorsing the IAB comment.
> 
> --Wendy
> 
> On 03/17/2016 01:53 PM, Marilia Maciel wrote:
>> Hi James, thanks for the clarifications you provided.
>> 
>> Based on this information and considering the little time we have, the
>> question seems to be: should NCSG endorse IAB's comment on RDAP? It would
>> be great if our members, specially those in our policy committee, could
>> share their views on the next hours.
>> 
>> Thanks!
>> Marília
>> 
>> 
>> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 5:24 AM, Shane Kerr <shane at time-travellers.org>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> All,
>>> 
>>> At 2016-03-17 09:22:34 +0100
>>> Shane Kerr <shane at time-travellers.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> I'm not sure the NCUC necessarily needs to have an opinion about the
>>>> technology itself, and can happily wait and weigh in on the parts that
>>>> matter to us.
>>> 
>>> Of course I meant NCSG. I blame decaffeinated coffee.
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Shane
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>> 
> 
> 
> --
> Wendy Seltzer -- wendy at seltzer.org

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 495 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20160318/9f6454c7/attachment.sig>