Public comment period on RDAP closing 18/03

Stephanie Perrin stephanie.perrin at MAIL.UTORONTO.CA
Wed Mar 16 22:47:18 EET 2016


1.  I agree
2.  I think we need still to fire a shot across the bow re policy. the 
lead on this (name escapes me, blame age and jet lag) pretty much 
invited me to comment in the public session.
Stephanie

On 2016-03-16 16:57, James Gannon wrote:
> So its important to note that the public comment period is purely on a 
> proposed operational profile on the technical side for RDAP. This is 
> not the policy side discussion which will take place in the context of 
> the nextGen RDS PDP that is ongoing. The overall discussion of 
> pros/cons of RDAP from the privacy perspective exist mostly within the 
> policy space.
>
> The important that that we need to ensure on the technical/operational 
> side, and as stated in the IABs comment, is to make sure that any 
> technical decisions that ICANN takes at this point in allowing 
> registrars/registries to utilised the RDAP profile is that it gives 
> the broadest range of options to the PDP from a policy perspective, if 
> we lock down the technical aspects at this early stage and do not 
> implement the technical ability of RDAP to provide authenticated and 
> differentiated access then we come to a quandary of implementation 
> during the PDP on the policy side where arguments will be made that 
> the technical implication doesn’t match with the policy.
>
>
> -James
>
> From: Matthew Shears <mshears at cdt.org <mailto:mshears at cdt.org>>
> Date: Wednesday 16 March 2016 at 8:52 p.m.
> To: James Gannon <james at cyberinvasion.net 
> <mailto:james at cyberinvasion.net>>, "NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU 
> <mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>" <NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU 
> <mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>>
> Subject: Re: Public comment period on RDAP closing 18/03
>
> James - what are the downsides and upsides for privacy of RDAP - 
> Andrew's mail did not seem to address the pros/cons except for 
> differentiated access....
> Thanks.
>
> On 3/16/2016 8:47 PM, James Gannon wrote:
>> Given the timelines involved I would suggest that the PC consider 
>> sending a message of endorsement of the position of the IAB 
>> https://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-rdap-profile-03dec15/msg00001.html which 
>> aligns with the discussions and thinking of many of the NCSG members 
>> involved in this item.
>>
>> James
>>
>> From: NCSG-Discuss <NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU> on behalf of 
>> Marilia Maciel <mariliamaciel at GMAIL.COM <mailto:mariliamaciel at GMAIL.COM>>
>> Reply-To: Marilia Maciel <mariliamaciel at GMAIL.COM 
>> <mailto:mariliamaciel at GMAIL.COM>>
>> Date: Wednesday 16 March 2016 at 8:23 p.m.
>> To: "NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU" <NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU 
>> <mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>>
>> Subject: Re: Public comment period on RDAP closing 18/03
>>
>> More information on this issue can be found here: 
>> https://www.icann.org/public-comments/rdap-profile-2015-12-03-en
>>
>> Best
>> Marília
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 5:19 PM, Marilia Maciel 
>> <mariliamaciel at gmail.com <mailto:mariliamaciel at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     Hello everyone,
>>
>>     The deadline to present inputs to the public comment period on
>>     the Registration Data Access Protocol(RDAP) Operational Profile
>>     forgTLD Registries and Registrars is *_closing 18/03_*.
>>
>>     To our NCSG members and particularly to those of us following
>>     privacy discussions more closely, is there any comment that we
>>     would like to present?
>>
>>     Thanks
>>     Marília
>>
>>     -- 
>>     *Marília Maciel*
>>     Pesquisadora Gestora - Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade - FGV
>>     Direito Rio
>>     Researcher and Coordinator - Center for Technology & Society
>>     - FGV Law School
>>     http://direitorio.fgv.br/cts
>>
>>     DiploFoundation associate - www.diplomacy.edu
>>     PoliTICs Magazine Advisory Committee - http://www.politics.org.br/
>>     Subscribe "Digital Rights: Latin America & the Caribbean" -
>>     http://www.digitalrightslac.net/en
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> *Marília Maciel*
>> Pesquisadora Gestora - Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade - FGV Direito Rio
>> Researcher and Coordinator - Center for Technology & Society - FGV 
>> Law School
>> http://direitorio.fgv.br/cts
>>
>> DiploFoundation associate - www.diplomacy.edu <http://www.diplomacy.edu>
>> PoliTICs Magazine Advisory Committee - http://www.politics.org.br/
>> Subscribe "Digital Rights: Latin America & the Caribbean" - 
>> http://www.digitalrightslac.net/en
>>
>
> -- 
>
> Matthew Shears | Director, Global Internet Policy & Human Rights Project
> Center for Democracy & Technology | cdt.org
> E:mshears at cdt.org  | T: +44.771.247.2987
>
> CDT's Annual Dinner, Tech Prom, is April 6, 2016. Don't miss out - register at cdt.org/annual-dinner.
>
> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient&utm_term=oa-2115-e> 
> 	Scanned for viruses. www.avast.com 
> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient&utm_term=oa-2115-e> 
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20160316/c087fd61/attachment.htm>


More information about the Ncsg-discuss mailing list