Council Item for Disussion

[Matthew Shears]

+ 1 Yes, open.  The CCWG bylaws work has been a useful training ground.


On 6/24/2016 9:41 AM, James Gannon wrote:
> Yes I’d support this, plenty of us who have been working on CWG and 
> CCWG can move quickly on this working with councillors in a bottom up 
> manner.
>
> -J
>
> From: NCSG-Discuss <NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU 
> <mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>> on behalf of farzaneh badii 
> <farzaneh.badii at GMAIL.COM <mailto:farzaneh.badii at GMAIL.COM>>
> Reply-To: farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at GMAIL.COM 
> <mailto:farzaneh.badii at GMAIL.COM>>
> Date: Friday 24 June 2016 at 07:24
> To: "NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU 
> <mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>" <NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU 
> <mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>>
> Subject: Re: Council Item for Disussion
>
> or perhaps call for an open group so that anyone can join?
>
>
>
> On 24 June 2016 at 08:01, Dorothy K. Gordon 
> <director-general at aiti-kace.com.gh 
> <mailto:director-general at aiti-kace.com.gh>> wrote:
>
>     In theory your approach would be ideal but given the deadlines
>     would it be effectively possible? Perhaps Council + a few others?
>
>     ----- Original Message -----
>     From: "James Gannon" <james at CYBERINVASION.NET
>     <mailto:james at CYBERINVASION.NET>>
>     To: NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
>     <mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>
>     Sent: Friday, June 24, 2016 6:12:30 AM
>     Subject: Council Item for Disussion
>
>
>     Hi All,
>     As we know there are many changes coming for the role of the GNSO
>     with our new accountability powers, I want to call out the
>     following item on the council agenda for Helsinki
>
>         * Item 5: COUNCIL VOTE - Approval to Form a Drafting Team to
>     Develop an Implementation Plan for New and Additional GNSO Powers
>     and Obligations under the Revised ICANN Bylaws (15 minutes)
>
>     I have to say that I am concerned about this, this is a critical
>     item for the GNSO and will set its strategic view and position for
>     the next 5-7 years most likely, I don’t fee very comfortable with
>     this being done in a potentially top down manner by council, I
>     feel that this should be developed in a bottom up manner by the
>     SGs and C’s first.
>
>
>     I would be interested in others thoughts so that we can guide the
>     PC on a position on this
>
>
>
>
>     James
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Farzaneh

-- 

Matthew Shears | Director, Global Internet Policy & Human Rights Project
Center for Democracy & Technology | cdt.org
E: mshears at cdt.org | T: +44.771.247.2987

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20160625/6ae2dfec/attachment.htm>