LETTER IN SUPPORT OF THE ATTRIBUTIONS AND MULTISTAKEHOLDER NATURE OF CGI.BR

Corinne Cath corinnecath at GMAIL.COM
Sat Jun 25 05:19:45 EEST 2016 

+ 1 for endorsing this letter. Best corinne
On Saturday, June 25, 2016, Corinne Cath <cattekwaad at gmail.com> wrote:

> + 1 for endorsing this letter.
> Best, corinne
>
> On Saturday, June 25, 2016, avri doria <avri at apc.org
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','avri at apc.org');>> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> I think the charter is clear that the NCSG-PC is the one to do make such
>> decisions:
>>
>> https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Charter
>>
>> > *2.5 The Policy Committee*
>> >
>> > The NCSG Policy Committee is responsible for:
>> >
>> >   * Discussion and development of substantive policies and statements
>> >     issued in the name of the NCSG. This activity will require
>> >     coordination with the membership and the Constituencies;
>> >   * Organize policy initiatives on behalf of NCSG membership,
>> >     including PDP initiatives from the membership;
>> >   * Provide policy research and guidance to NCSG representatives on
>> >     the GNSO Council;
>> >   * Keep membership informed of GNSO Council activities;
>> >   * Organize, appoint where appropriate, and track NCSG participation
>> >     in GNSO and other pertinent Working Groups.
>> >   * Organization and oversight of NCSG participation in any GNSO
>> >     Council-related tasks, whether mandated by Bylaws, Council
>> >     Procedures or Council decisions.
>> >   * Document methods and procedures used for decision-making. Such
>> >     documentation is subject to review by the NCSG‑EC.
>> >
>>
>> avri
>>
>>
>> On 25-Jun-16 02:46, Seun Ojedeji wrote:
>> >
>> > FWIW and without having any opinion about the letter, i have observed
>> > in the past where endorsements are suggested to be done individually
>> > and not as NCSG. From all indication it seem this particular one will
>> > be signed by NCSG? So two questions/comments
>> >
>> > 1. What's the process to determine whether to commit to stuffs like
>> > this as a group or not. Who makes the decision? The Chancellors? The EC?
>> >
>> > 2. What are the criteria that makes a statement qualified? Is it
>> > statements from organisations known by(or affiliated to) active
>> > participants?
>> >
>> > Cheers!
>> >
>> > Sent from my LG G4
>> > Kindly excuse brevity and typos
>> >
>> > Hi
>> >
>> > I too would strongly support endorsing this Letter, which is squarely
>> > within the domain of our activity. IndeedCGI.br <http://cgi.br> has
>> > been a supporter of NCUC and related initiatives, as well as an
>> > exemplar of multi stakeholder collaboration and governance through
>> > years where this has been challenged at the national and global
>> > levels. If our support would be at all useful to them, they deserve to
>> > have it.
>> >
>> > Bill
>> >
>> > Sent from my iPad
>> >
>> > On Jun 24, 2016, at 22:35, Mueller, Milton L <milton at GATECH.EDU
>> > <mailto:milton at gatech.edu>> wrote:
>> >
>> >     > I would support this statement in principle.
>> >
>> > >
>> > > Milton L Mueller
>> > > Professor, School of Public Policy
>> > > Georgia Institute of Technology
>> > >
>> > > On Jun 24, 2016, at 15:16, Renata Aquino Ribeiro <raquino at GMAIL.COM
>> > <mailto:raquino at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> > >
>> >
>> >     >> Hi
>> >
>> > >>
>> > >> As a grateful former student ofEGI.br <http://egi.br>, I'd support
>> > Carlos' ask for international organizations to sign this letter.
>> > >>
>> > >> Renata Aquino Ribeiro
>> > >> http://bit.ly/renataineng <http://bit.ly/renataineng>
>> > >>
>> > >> Em 24 de jun de 2016 14:34, "Carlos Afonso" <ca at cafonso.ca
>> > <mailto:ca at cafonso.ca>> escreveu:
>> >
>> >     >>>
>> >
>> > >>> [sorry for possible duplicates]
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Note: given the recent transition in the Brazilian federal
>> government
>> > >>> and the political uncertainties involved, a group of civil society
>> and
>> > >>> academic organizations has produced this public declaration in
>> defense
>> > >>> of the multistakeholder nature ofCGI.br <http://cgi.br> and its
>> > attributions.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> LETTER IN SUPPORT OF THE ATTRIBUTIONS AND MULTISTAKEHOLDER NATURE
>> > OFCGI.BR <http://CGI.BR>
>> > >>>
>> > >>> 24-6-2016
>> > >>>
>> > >>> The Internet Steering Committe of Brazil,CGI.br <http://cgi.br>, a
>> > multistakeholder
>> > >>> commission, has a crucial mission in the development of the
>> > Internet in
>> > >>> Brazil. In particular,CGI.br <http://cgi.br> supervises the
>> > actions ofNIC.br <http://nic.br> - a
>> > >>> non-profit private civil society organizationm in charge of
>> > carrying out
>> > >>> the management of all activities derived from policies defined by
>> the
>> > >>> Committee. Decree Number 4829, of September, 2003, describes
>> > >>> attributions ofCGI.br <http://cgi.br>, which include:
>> > >>>
>> > >>> - proposing policies and procedures regarding the regulation of
>> > Internet
>> > >>> activities;
>> > >>>
>> > >>> - recommending standards for technical and operational procedures
>> for
>> > >>> the Internet in Brazil;
>> > >>>
>> > >>> - establishing strategic directives related to the use and
>> development
>> > >>> of the Internet in Brazil;
>> > >>>
>> > >>> - promoting studies and technical standards for network and service
>> > >>> security in the country;
>> > >>>
>> > >>> - coordinating the allocation of Internet addresses (IPs) in
>> > Brazil and
>> > >>> registration in the ".br" domain;
>> > >>>
>> > >>> - collecting, organizing and disseminating information on Internet
>> > >>> services, including indicators and statistics;
>> > >>>
>> > >>> - be represented in national and international technical forums
>> > related
>> > >>> to the Internet;
>> > >>>
>> > >>> - to adopt administrative and operational procedures so that
>> Internet
>> > >>> governance in Brazil follows internationally accepted standards,
>> > >>> enabling it to celebrate agreements and partnerships.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> These activities, fully funded by private income derived from
>> > >>> distribution of domain names and IP numbers, are essential for the
>> > >>> operation and development of the Internet in Brazil. These
>> > attributions
>> > >>> are being carried out in a multistakeholder approach, with
>> > participation
>> > >>> of civil society, academia, technical community, private sector and
>> > >>> government.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> This pluralist feature has been the basis for the charter of
>> > principles
>> > >>> which is at the origin of the Brazilian Civil Rights Framework for
>> the
>> > >>> Internet ("Marco Civil da Internet"). The success of this pluralist
>> > >>> practice has turnedCGI.br <http://cgi.br> into a worldwide
>> > reference on Internet
>> > >>> governance, considering that since its creation in 1995, and even
>> > in the
>> > >>> preparation of the Decree of 2003, any change in its structure and
>> > >>> operation has been preceded by broad consultations with society,
>> > >>> including significant participation of civil society and academic
>> > >>> organizations.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> In order to protect the stability, security and quality of the work
>> > >>> which has been and continues to be carried out and developed by the
>> > >>> Committee, the undersigned organizations affirm the centrality
>> > ofCGI.br <http://cgi.br>
>> > >>> to develop activities absolutely vital for the Internet of today and
>> > >>> tomorrow in the country, stressing the importance of preserving the
>> > >>> above attributions, as well as the pluralist, multissectorial
>> > nature of
>> > >>> CGI.br <http://cgi.br>.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Actantes
>> > >>> Artigo 19
>> > >>> Barão de Itararé
>> > >>> Coding Rights
>> > >>> Colab-USP
>> > >>> Coletivo Digital
>> > >>> CTS-FGV
>> > >>> GPoPAI/USP
>> > >>> Ibase
>> > >>> Ibidem
>> > >>> InternetLab
>> > >>> Instituto Bem Estar Brasil
>> > >>> Intervozes
>> > >>> ITSRio
>> > >>> Lavits
>> > >>> Medialab.UFRJ
>> > >>> Nupef
>> > >>> ProTeste
>> > >>> Safernet Brasil
>> > >>> ULEPICC-BR
>> > >>>
>> > >>> --
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Carlos A. Afonso
>> > >>> [emails são pessoais exceto quando explicitamente indicado em
>> > contrário]
>> > >>> [emails are personal unless explicitly indicated otherwise]
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Instituto Nupef -https://nupef.org.br <https://nupef.org.br>
>> > >>> CGI.br <http://cgi.br> -http://cgi.br <http://cgi.br>
>> > >>> ISOC-BR -https://isoc.org.br <https://isoc.org.br>
>> > >>>
>> > >>> GPG 0x9EE8F8E3
>> > >>>
>> > >>> _______________________________________________
>> > >>> To manage your ISOC subscriptions or unsubscribe,
>> > >>> please log into the ISOC Member Portal:
>> > >>> https://portal.isoc.org/ <https://portal.isoc.org/>
>> > >>> Then choose Interests & Subscriptions from the My Account menu.
>> >
>>
>>
>> ---
>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>
>
>
> --
> Corinne Cath
>
>
> 'The management of normality is hard work'
>
>
>

-- 
Corinne J.N. Cath
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20160625/af8e91c9/attachment.htm>

More information about the Ncsg-discuss mailing list