Council Item for Disussion

James Gannon james at CYBERINVASION.NET
Fri Jun 24 01:41:36 EEST 2016


Yes I’d support this, plenty of us who have been working on CWG and CCWG can move quickly on this working with councillors in a bottom up manner.

-J

From: NCSG-Discuss <NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU<mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>> on behalf of farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at GMAIL.COM<mailto:farzaneh.badii at GMAIL.COM>>
Reply-To: farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at GMAIL.COM<mailto:farzaneh.badii at GMAIL.COM>>
Date: Friday 24 June 2016 at 07:24
To: "NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU<mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>" <NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU<mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>>
Subject: Re: Council Item for Disussion

or perhaps call for an open group so that anyone can join?



On 24 June 2016 at 08:01, Dorothy K. Gordon <director-general at aiti-kace.com.gh<mailto:director-general at aiti-kace.com.gh>> wrote:
In theory your approach would be ideal but given the deadlines would it be effectively possible? Perhaps Council + a few others?

----- Original Message -----
From: "James Gannon" <james at CYBERINVASION.NET<mailto:james at CYBERINVASION.NET>>
To: NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU<mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2016 6:12:30 AM
Subject: Council Item for Disussion


Hi All,
As we know there are many changes coming for the role of the GNSO with our new accountability powers, I want to call out the following item on the council agenda for Helsinki

    * Item 5: COUNCIL VOTE - Approval to Form a Drafting Team to Develop an Implementation Plan for New and Additional GNSO Powers and Obligations under the Revised ICANN Bylaws (15 minutes)

I have to say that I am concerned about this, this is a critical item for the GNSO and will set its strategic view and position for the next 5-7 years most likely, I don’t fee very comfortable with this being done in a potentially top down manner by council, I feel that this should be developed in a bottom up manner by the SGs and C’s first.


I would be interested in others thoughts so that we can guide the PC on a position on this




James



--
Farzaneh
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20160624/5b62b3c1/attachment.htm>


More information about the Ncsg-discuss mailing list