[] MAG Call with UNDESA/NY

[farzaneh badii]

Thanks Avri. I don't see anything new there. But I don't understand the
argument of we want to be a focussed small group brainstorming hence remote
participation might not be possible and that they will look into it! It is
not rocket science to do remote participation even for small brain storming
groups! We have done break out sessions with online participants using
Adobe at ICANN and other places. What is so difficult? Do they need an
adobe license? They just have to make a couple of people among the nominees
responsible for interacting with the remote participants and take
responsibility for facilitating it. they are so eager to go there, why not
take on some responsibility to include other people?

On 7 June 2016 at 01:47, avri doria <avri at acm.org> wrote:

>
> has not been commented on or reviewed by MAG yet.
>
>
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject:        [IGFmaglist] MAG Call with UNDESA/NY
> Date:   Mon, 6 Jun 2016 23:41:46 +0200
> From:   Chengetai Masango <cmasango at unog.ch>
> To:     IGF Maglist <Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org>
>
>
>
> Dear All,
>
> Please find attached the summary report of last weeks MAG call with
> UNDESA/NY.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Chengetai
>
>
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>



-- 
Farzaneh
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20160606/5745cee6/attachment.htm>