By Laws Section 2.4.2.1 Appeal on the election process

[Arsène Tungali]

Does the fact one is not signing this list mean one is endorsing the
current form of ballot? What is the best way to thick "NOTA" to this
discussion? I think that's the best option for me given there is a lot that
have been said in this whole discussion but which is not covered or
summarised by the few sentences presented in the attached?

------------------------
**Arsène Tungali**
Co-Founder & Executive Director, *Rudi international
<http://www.rudiinternational.org>*,
CEO,* Smart Services Sarl <http://www.smart-serv.info>*, *Mabingwa Forum
<http://www.mabingwa-forum.com>*
Tel: +243 993810967
GPG: 523644A0
*Goma, Democratic Republic of Congo*

2015 Mandela Washington Felllow
<http://tungali.blogspot.com/2015/06/selected-for-2015-mandela-washington.html>
(YALI) - ISOC IGF Ambassador
<http://www.internetsociety.org/what-we-do/education-and-leadership-programmes/next-generation-leaders/igf-ambassadors-programme/2015Ambassadors>
<http://www.internetsociety.org/what-we-do/education-and-leadership-programmes/next-generation-leaders/igf-ambassadors-programme/2015Ambassadors>-

Blogger <http://tungali.blogspot.com> - ICANN Fellow
<https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-07-18-en>. The HuffingtonPost
UK <http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/liza-bel/drc_b_8958150.html>

2016-08-23 17:08 GMT+02:00 Sam Lanfranco <lanfran at yorku.ca>:

> Avri & "The Group of 21"
>
> There has been a lot of back and forth about what exactly is being done
> wrong, or being done right,
> in this election process. In your appeal you write:
>
> *"Without any notice to the membership or the Executive Committee, the
> NCSG Chair changed*
> *the longstanding interpretation of the election rules, causing confusion
> among the membership*
> *once the ballot was released"*
>
> I agree that there is much confusion so could you expand on your appeal
> and spell out in a few words
> what exactly what the longstanding interpretation and what change violated
> that interpretation.
> I am not asking about the merits of either approach, only for clarity
> about the nature of the change.
>
> Sam L. NPOC/csih
>
> On 8/23/2016 10:44 AM, avri doria wrote:
>
> NCSG colleagues,
>
> *Pursuant to Section 2.4.2.1 of NCSG’s Charter, the NCSG Members
> signed***in the enclosed***hereby initiate an appeal of the NCSG EC
> decision to refuse to fix the contested ballots and properly clarify the
> election process before proceeding.*
>
> Thank you,
>
> Avri Doria
>
> on behalf of the 21 members who signed the appeal*
> ***
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20160823/d1583b7d/attachment.htm>