By Laws Section 2.4.2.1 Appeal on the election process

[Sam Lanfranco]

Avri & "The Group of 21"

There has been a lot of back and forth about what exactly is being done 
wrong, or being done right,
in this election process. In your appeal you write:

/"Without any notice to the membership or the Executive Committee, the 
NCSG Chair changed//
//the longstanding interpretation of the election rules, causing 
confusion among the membership//
//once the ballot was released"//
/
I agree that there is much confusion so could you expand on your appeal 
and spell out in a few words
what exactly what the longstanding interpretation and what change 
violated that interpretation.
I am not asking about the merits of either approach, only for clarity 
about the nature of the change.

Sam L. NPOC/csih

On 8/23/2016 10:44 AM, avri doria wrote:
> NCSG colleagues,
>
> *Pursuant to Section 2.4.2.1 of NCSG’s Charter, the NCSG Members
> signed***in the enclosed***hereby initiate an appeal of the NCSG EC
> decision to refuse to fix the contested ballots and properly clarify the
> election process before proceeding.*
>
> Thank you,
>
> Avri Doria
>
> on behalf of the 21 members who signed the appeal*
> ***
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20160823/c75cfe3a/attachment.htm>