Proposed Items for the Meet the Candidates call tomorrow: Transparency and coordination in Council

[James Gannon]

Im sorry but I entirely disagree with this, this is an incorrect description of directed voting, it is not censorship in any way.
Its accountability of our councillors to ensure that the NCSG is being represented In the way the reflects the feels of the majority of the members, we are the only constituency that does not direct its votes.


-Jmaes

From: NCSG-Discuss <NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU<mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>> on behalf of Remmy Nweke <0000049a5c50c0cf-dmarc-request at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU<mailto:0000049a5c50c0cf-dmarc-request at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>>
Reply-To: Remmy Nweke <remmyn at YAHOO.CO.UK<mailto:remmyn at YAHOO.CO.UK>>
Date: Wednesday 17 August 2016 at 11:43
To: "NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU<mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>" <NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU<mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>>
Subject: Re: Proposed Items for the Meet the Candidates call tomorrow: Transparency and coordination in Council

As much as I want us to strengthen the accountability process, it amounts to gagging or censoring the councillors in the case of directed voting.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20160817/6df27c3c/attachment.htm>