[NCUC-DISCUSS] Invitation to join the #Internet4All campaign

[Mouad GOUAIMA]

This is a great initiative ! But i think that internet access and
 infrastructure are not ICANN's mission. So i think that it would better to
support it individually and in this case it would be yes definitely !

Le mercredi 20 avril 2016, Arsène Tungali <arsenebaguma at gmail.com> a écrit :

> Thanks Carlos!
>
> Le mercredi 20 avril 2016, Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez G. <crg at isoc-cr.org
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','crg at isoc-cr.org');>> a écrit :
>
>> You go young friend!!! Bill Drake has prohibited anyone over 40 to
>> participate!!!
>>
>> I believe that the NCSG has the most varied background in all things
>> Internet and you should alway look for answers to your questions here, its
>> an amazing group based on my personal experience.
>>
>> But as far as the GNSO Council is concerned, in the happy times of the
>> IANA transition that we are living trough right now, we are all very
>> sensitive to the narrow remit of ICANNs mission, its policy development
>> processes in particular. Fro that reason many colleagues in this thread
>> have said that anybody in its personal capacity should follow up the
>> initiative as they like, not as a NCSG joint exercise.
>>
>> Hope you enjoy the meeting.
>>
>> Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez
>> +506 8837 7176
>> Skype: carlos.raulg
>> Current UTC offset: -6.00 (Costa Rica)
>> On 20 Apr 2016, at 13:02, Arsène Tungali wrote:
>>
>> I personally plan on attending this event and luckily be part of this
>>> initiative on personal capacity as an Internet Governance actor, mainly
>>> from a civil society point of view.
>>>
>>> Plus, i am young :). I would push for ncsg to endorse if icann
>>> regional staff are planning to officially be there.
>>>
>>> Also would like to know if ncuc has never involved itself in anything
>>> else
>>> not domain related (as asked by GG).
>>>
>>> Le mercredi 20 avril 2016, Grace Githaiga <ggithaiga at hotmail.com> a
>>> écrit :
>>>
>>> Deserves support. Highly recommended. Has NCUC not previously supported
>>>> non domain issues that are internet related?
>>>>
>>>> Rgds
>>>> Grace
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>> Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 13:48:21 -0400
>>>> From: douglaskarel at GMAIL.COM
>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','douglaskarel at GMAIL.COM');>
>>>> Subject: Re: Invitation to join the #Internet4All campaign
>>>> To: NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU');>
>>>>
>>>> Yes , +1 and Definitely!
>>>>
>>>> This is a good initiative worthy of our support!
>>>>
>>>> regards
>>>>
>>>> Karel
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 1:35 PM, Robin Gross <robin at ipjustice.org
>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','robin at ipjustice.org');>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Agreed.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Robin
>>>>
>>>> On Apr 20, 2016, at 9:57 AM, Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez G. <crg at isoc-cr.org
>>>>>
>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','crg at isoc-cr.org');>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> @Milton +1
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez
>>>>> +506 8837 7176
>>>>> Skype: carlos.raulg
>>>>> Current UTC offset: -6.00 (Costa Rica)
>>>>> On 20 Apr 2016, at 10:42, Mueller, Milton L wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I agree, NCUC/NCSG are appropriate vehicles for publicizing these
>>>>>>
>>>>> initiatives among civil society organizations/individuals, and many of
>>>> its
>>>> members may be interested in joining in, but #Internet4All does not
>>>> seem to
>>>> be a domain name policy issue and I think we had better stick to our
>>>> basic
>>>> mission.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> --MM
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>> From: NCSG-Discuss [mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU');>] On
>>>> Behalf Of
>>>>
>>>>> James Gannon
>>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2016 12:26 PM
>>>>>>> To: NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU');>
>>>>
>>>>> Subject: Re: Invitation to join the #Internet4All campaign
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Just on this point I hope that as this seems to be an infrastructure
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> related
>>>>
>>>>> campaign.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Still reading about it at the moment but my gut reaction is that this
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> may be
>>>>
>>>>> more appropriate for individual NCUC members and organisations to
>>>>>>> endorse?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 20/04/2016, 17:12, "NCSG-Discuss on behalf of Carlos Raúl
>>>>>>> Gutiérrez
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> G."
>>>>
>>>>> <NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU');> on
>>>> behalf
>>>> of crg at ISOC-CR.ORG <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','crg at ISOC-CR.ORG');>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is ICANN (regional) staff participating in this activity? Could also
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> be
>>>>
>>>>> part of the information we may need for a qualified opinion.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> --
>>> ------
>>> Arsene Tungali,
>>> Executive Director, Rudi International
>>> Founder, Mabingwa Forum
>>> Goma, DRCongo
>>>
>>> Sent via Mobile (excuse type and brievity)
>>>
>>
>
> --
> ------
> Arsene Tungali,
> Executive Director, Rudi International
> Founder, Mabingwa Forum
> Goma, DRCongo
>
> Sent via Mobile (excuse type and brievity)
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20160420/353dbcc0/attachment.htm>