[SPAM]Re: Last CCWG comments last call

[Niels ten Oever]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Also agree!

Thanks,

Niels

On 09/08/2015 11:13 AM, Matthew Shears wrote:
> Likewise - thanks Milton and all!
> 
> On 08/09/2015 10:10, Joy Liddicoat wrote:
>> Thank you Milton, I agree with the proposed new language
>> 
>> Joy Liddicoat Sent from my phone
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 8/09/2015, at 14:28, Mueller, Milton L 
>> <<mailto:milton.mueller at PUBPOLICY.GATECH.EDU>milton.mueller at PUBPOLICY
.GATECH.EDU>
>>
>> 
wrote:
>> 
>>> OK, I have made some minor modifications based on these
>>> discussions, the only significant one related to human rights.
>>> The new language reads:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The CCWG solicits comments on two different ways of
>>> formulating ICANN’s commitment to human rights. Option one
>>> expressed ICANN’s commitment “to respect the fundamental human
>>> rights of the exercise of free expression and the free flow of
>>> information.” Option 2 expressed ICANN’s commitment more
>>> broadly, “Within its mission and in its operations, ICANN will
>>> be committed to respect internationally recognized fundamental
>>> human rights.”
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> With one member organization exception, NCSG tends toward
>>> support for the second, more general formulation. The first
>>> formulation is too limited because other human rights, such as
>>> privacy, are relevant to ICANN policies. We do, however,
>>> recognize that a generic reference to human rights might not
>>> work as effectively as more specific requirements, and that
>>> freedom of expression and privacy are two human rights most
>>> directly relevant to ICANN’s policy activity. Our preference,
>>> therefore, would be to formulate the commitment this way:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> “Within its mission and in its operations, ICANN will be
>>> committed to respect internationally recognized fundamental
>>> human rights, in particular freedom of expression and
>>> privacy.”
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I hope the policy committee can approve the whole document and
>>> get it submitted to the CCWG public comment period tomorrow.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --MM
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> *From:*NCSG-Discuss [mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU] *On
>>> Behalf Of *William Drake *Sent:* Monday, September 7, 2015 7:35
>>> AM *To:* NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU 
>>> <mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU> *Subject:* Re:
>>> [NCSG-Discuss] CCWG comments last call
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Sep 7, 2015, at 11:22 AM, Tapani Tarvainen 
>>> <ncuc at TAPANI.TARVAINEN.INFO
>>> <mailto:ncuc at TAPANI.TARVAINEN.INFO>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> compromise phrasing like "... human rights, in particular 
>>> freedom of expression and privacy" might work.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Works for me, per the F2F discussions with other stakeholders
>>> since summer 2014.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Bill
>>> 
> 
> --
> 
> Matthew Shears Director - Global Internet Policy and Human Rights 
> Center for Democracy & Technology mshears at cdt.org + 44 771 247 2987
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
- --
>
> 
Avast logo <https://www.avast.com/antivirus> 	
> 
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus
> software. www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>
> 
> 

- -- 
Niels ten Oever
Head of Digital

Article 19
www.article19.org

PGP fingerprint    8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4
                   678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJV7rnXAAoJEAi1oPJjbWjptiwH/AxTUXPCHuPKQglHYHHA2gox
jP0krmYqQAiDSs1vR5GG9GDGnwk9vhOX6Kbo3vcPpR+6YR5YlTYrHPZq2NeRZVJu
xnKP31Gz9foB971elTDqAx5ofFP5rFLbeICS8xCjVQB/cguwSvlTYGbDAGDRcOvV
3dVXa0e9PAvMhxMP/aJc/YQ51f76aCX8MZYOB03P2aqAlhRDcwYZqv9h8/L4CS4+
X2jJg0RzD8YBbOyJUZ09l/63/8Si4pyjTRcPznyoa+VuyNiKNUvM96MsnHEEt072
DoPZxRj4Pb3J0DPLDBjIAeD4bBL3xH76uHt0tdpmEAwfnjirkcKIMRpO46E3HKI=
=URkS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----