curious what you all think about -an RFC 6761bis item

[Sam Lanfranco]

Avri has raised the question of whether or not NCSG should be concerned 
with the names and resolving protocols questions raised in the following 
IETF document:

https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-problem-00.txt

Having read the document here is my small contribution. There may be 
some issues in the questions raised that might become of interest to 
NCSG but given the nature of the issue – reserve names linked to other 
(non-DNS) resolution protocols- my advice is to leave it up to the IETF 
to ruminate over the issues and, at the appropriate times, that may toss 
up issues for NCSG to consider. It does not look like an area where NCSG 
mining documents for NCSG-centric issues would be productive.

Sam L. (NPOC)

/
//
/
/On 2015-11-04 4:50 PM, Avri Doria wrote://
/
> /https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-problem-00.txt//i 
> know the council is not interested in such things, but thought maybe 
> the NCSG is. avri/

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20151104/4494a1bd/attachment.htm>