Update of latest IGF MAG mtg.

Remmy Nweke remmyn at GMAIL.COM
Mon May 25 11:16:41 EEST 2015


Thanks Avri for the update.
Keep walking and working. They say the expectation of hardwork is more work.
regards
Remmy Nweke
@ITRealms

On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org> wrote:

> (The following is a basic copy of a message I sent to another list)
>
> Hi,
>
> Yes, the issue with main sessions is still open and a touch confusing.
> After spending a day and half finding our way to a list of workshops we
> started on the Main session plan.  A quick explanation on how we got to
> the list of workshops while I am at it.
>
> - the top ranked 60 were automatically in.
> - the next 10 were in unless someone had a reason for them not being
> in.  I think in the end they may have all ended up in, though I am not
> positive about 1 of them.  Will need to check notes and final lists to
> be sure.
> - for the next 30, it was a balancing process.  Based on the various
> proportions, e.g. previous organizer : new organizer,  or developed
> nation : developing, same old panel : other format, same old topic : new
> topic, stakeholder group : other stakeholder groups, &c. MAG members had
> to champion a session on the balancing perspective ( a blanket
> acceptance of all sessions being a good sessions was made the chair)
> for it to be considered further.  We then went through them in a
> detailed sort of way trying to balance.  It took 2 passes through a list
> of nominated sessions to come to the 100 selected.  The rest of workshop
> sessions are filled by open fora, dynamic coalition (DC), best practice
> fora (BPF), and the intersessional work.
>
> We also spent a fair amount of time of micromanaging, deciding whether
> someone needed 90 minutes, 60 minutes or a flash.  Some of us objected
> to this sillyness, but many others of us  felt the MAG was too important
> not to know better about how much time a session should consume.  We
> were a program committee after all. Bah, humbug!
>
> (re, when the final list will be posted, don't know for sure but expect
> soon)
>
> Re the intersessional work,
>
> This is being worked in response to CSTD recommendations on IGF
> Improvements, there is a an open team of MAG members and others working
> on this effort (I am one of the coordinators, but have been a passive
> coordinator so far only taking on activities Constance made me get
> involved in).  It was slow to get going.  At this point the call is
> coming out in the next day or so.  Basically using the working group
> (WG) concept that is borrowed from many institutions and has been
> modified for BPF, we will first
>
> ●      Launch public call for background contributions on the theme of
> “/Policy Options for Connecting the Next Billion/”. Contributions will
> be gathered and ultimately incorporated in the output through an
> iterative process.
>
> &c.
>
> The call should be out shortly, a draft from 22 May is attached. i
> have until the end of today to comment.  There was a lunch conversation
> on the draft.
>
> Re The origin of the main session schedule
>
> In terms of main sessions, a self selected ad-hoc subgroup had met
> during lunch on day 2 and set up a schedule that includes a half day on
> IGF @ 10  and a full day dedicated to WSIS+10 (3 main session slots).
> Therefore , when considering pre-session, starting and closing ceremony
> left (3 full session), 2 full sessions (4 hemisessions) were left for
> substantive issues.
>
> It seems we were going to invite the President of the General Assembly
> (PGA) and needed to dedicate that much time to WSIS   If the PGA rejects
> the idea, then we will get 1 thematic session back.
>
> Re WSIS session:
>
> Part of what is playing out was act 3 in the WSIS Continuation stage.
> Starting in CSTD (which I did not attend), continuing through the 2
> weeks of ITU Council (which I did attend) and coming into IGF was
> a bit successful but mostly not.  ITU wanted to organize a
> multistakeholder consultation on WSIS but was not allowed to by the
> members states.  So now IGF was being used by those who want a
> consultation on the future of WSIS.  Last stop before NYC.   And the
> largest most diverse of group of participants is to be found in IGF 2015.
> So if the PGA, it will be Denmark I believe,  is willing to come to the
> IGF for consultations, there will be a full day of consultations in Brazil.
>
> Re IGF @ 10
>
> Since the UNGA is going to decide on IGF's continuing fate this year,
> that seemed necessary to most all of us thought it a reasonable bit of
> scheduling.  Some think it should have more time.
>
> Re the  remaining 2 main session slots,  we were given a list and each
> given a chance to argue to 2 topics on the list.  I am not sure I
> remember the whole list, but it included
>
> - net neutrality
> - internet economy
> - human rights
> - IANA stuff
> - ... (couple more i did not write them down)
>
> In any case there was a supported recommendation that those sitting in
> the room should not be deciding this on our own and that we should poll
> the community.   In the end the chair decided those of us in the MAG
> that championed a particular theme should work on a brief description
> and we should put them out  for discussion.
>
> I may think of more, but this is it for pre-breakfast mind-dump on a
> holiday morning of a day when I have a paper to finish a draft of.
> Happy to answer questions if I can.
>
> avri
>
>
> Note: on having ATTACHED a file, do not know where it could be found
> online.  Might be able to find it on line, but did not want to spend the
> time looking for it.  So am including the same attachment I included in
> the original note I am copying.
>
>
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> http://www.avast.com
>



-- 
____
REMMY NWEKE,  Lead Strategist/Group Executive Editor,
DigitalSENSE Africa Media Ltd [*Multiple-award winning medium*]
(DigitalSENSE Business News
<http://www.digitalsenseafrica.com.ng/businessnews>; ITREALMS
<http://www.itrealms.com.ng>, NaijaAgroNet <http://www.naijaagronet.com.ng>)
Block F1, Shop 133 Moyosore Aboderin Plaza, Bolade Junction, Oshodi-Lagos
M: 234-8033592762, 8023122558, 8051000475, T: @ITRealms
<http://www.twitter.com/ITRealms>
Author: A Decade of ICT Reportage in Nigeria
<https://www.facebook.com/adecadeofictreportageinnigeria‎>
___________________________________________________________________
*Confidentiality Notice:* The information in this document and attachments
are confidential and may also be privileged information. It is intended
only for the use of the named recipient. Remmy Nweke does not accept legal
responsibility for the contents of this e-mail. If you are not the intended
recipient, please notify me immediately, then delete this document and do
not disclose the contents of this document to any other person, nor make
any copies. Violators may face court persecution.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20150525/ca2edb6f/attachment.htm>


More information about the Ncsg-discuss mailing list