[PC-NCSG] Fwd: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] CWG Draft Proposal - A survey regarding the CSC and MRT

Rafik Dammak rafik.dammak at GMAIL.COM
Mon Jan 5 07:35:34 EET 2015


Hi Avri,

Thank you for sharing this.

Rafik


2015-01-05 9:56 GMT+09:00 Avri Doria <avri at acm.org>:

>
> Hi,
>
> Attached is a copy of the survey the CWG Stewardship members and
> participants are talking over the next 4 days.
>
> As the NCSG representing member, I supposed to give my best guess of a
> NCSG position in the answers.
>
> Input will be helpful.
>
> avri
>
>
>
>
> -------- Forwarded Message --------  Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] CWG Draft
> Proposal - A survey regarding the CSC and MRT  Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2015
> 21:26:03 -0000  From: Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson at afilias.info>
> <jrobinson at afilias.info>  Reply-To: jrobinson at afilias.info  Organization:
> Afilias  To: cwg-stewardship at icann.org
>
>  Dear All,
>
>
>
> As communicated on this Group’s mailing list last week, we have worked on
> and prepared a survey regarding the CSC and MRT. The survey, is available
> online (*http://goo.gl/forms/qYe8wqfPIM* <http://goo.gl/forms/qYe8wqfPIM>).
>
>
>
>
> Through this survey, we are very keen to hear from as many of you as
> possible and therefore strongly encourage *every* CWG member and
> participant to complete the survey no later than *23:59 UTC on Thursday,
> 8 January*.  Note that it should be possible to complete the survey in
> 15-30 minutes time.
>
>
>
> We understand that the time you have been given to respond is very short
> and therefore that you may not be able to consult with any groups that they
> are a part of or represent.  To the extent that Members can reflect the
> views of the groups they represent, that is desirable, but personal
> responses should be provided if that is not possible.  Participants are
> asked to express their personal views.
>
>
>
> This survey is based on suggestions arising from the public comments, as
> well as additional, related questions. The overall goal is to get a high
> level sense of the views of the CWG participants (i.e. Members and
> Participants) regarding these suggestions prior to the intensive work
> weekend on 10-11 January. The results of the survey will be used to guide
> the CWG in considering the public comments and continuing its work toward
> development of a final proposal for submission to the ICG.
>
>
>
> Please note that this is NOT a consensus poll in any shape or form.
>
>  Thanks in advance for your cooperation.
>
>
>
> Best wishes,
>
>
>
>
>
> Jonathan Robinson and Lise Fuhr
>
>
>
> Please note: Another survey is planned for a few days from now and that
> will include issues related to the Independent Appeals Panel (IAP) and
> Contract Co.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20150105/2bb5fad2/attachment.htm>


More information about the Ncsg-discuss mailing list