[Poll] Topics for discussion: NCSG - ICANN Board meeting Tuesday 10th February

Brenden Kuerbis bkuerbis at INTERNETGOVERNANCE.ORG
Tue Feb 3 08:34:49 EET 2015


+1

At a minimum, this position should be identified by whomever is the lead
discussant.


On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 7:59 PM, Milton L Mueller <mueller at syr.edu> wrote:

> > -----Original Message-----
> > I cannot stress enough
> > how bad an idea it is I believe it is to negotiate a definition for
> public interest
> > within the ICANN context. I can see this becoming very problematic in
> gTLD
> > policy development and the resultant contractual requirements of
> registries
> > and registrars.
>
> This means you are exactly the right person for the job!
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20150203/be8cb42e/attachment.htm>


More information about the Ncsg-discuss mailing list