A must-read about the CCWG accountability proposal

[Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez]

> On Aug 12, 2015, at 7:52 AM, Mueller, Milton L <milton.mueller at PUBPOLICY.GATECH.EDU> wrote:
> 
> 
> Or, if you believe in "equal footing," why not have all GNSO Stakeholder Groups, NCSG, RySG, RrSG and CSG, have the same number of votes in the community mechanism? Why don't SGs qualify for "equal footing?" 
> 


Very good question on the composition and representation of stakeholders in the GNSO, as opposed to the one member model & NonCom model.


Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez
_____________________

email: crg at isoc-cr.org
Skype: carlos.raulg
+506 8837 7173 (cel)
+506 4000 2000 (home)
+506 2290 3678 (fax)
_____________________
Apartado 1571-1000
San Jose, COSTA RICA


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20150812/5b492889/attachment.htm>