[Policy] IANA transition and ICANN accountability proposal : NCSG comments

[Sam Lanfranco]

I have a shorter history observing the role of GAC inside ICANN, but a 
longer history of observing governments, and I am the position that the 
transition should take place keeping GAC pretty much in its existing 
advisory role where there are, and will be, continues pressures for role 
modification. It would open up a very dangerous and destabilizing 
struggle if “...the GAC dissented from whatever Dublin adopts”.

We need to keep a collaborative element to the struggles for position 
within ICANN. Moving to a pure adversarial stance in this area would be 
a lose-lose recipe for disaster.

Sam L.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20150812/95569d00/attachment.htm>