A must-read about the CCWG accountability proposal

[William Drake]

Really useful piece from Brenden, really working problem to fix.

Bill

> On Aug 12, 2015, at 3:25 AM, Robin Gross <robin at ipjustice.org> wrote:
> 
> Excellent analysis from Brenden on one key flaw in the CCWG Accountability's existing proposal - how the proposed SOAC "voting weights" empowers some parts of the ICANN community (ACs) while disempowering others (including the GNSO) as compared to the existing balance of power in ICANN's structure.  So this is one gaping hole we need to fix in the draft proposal, which otherwise has recommended some significant improvements (like the Independent Review process and Reconsideration Request process).
> 
> Thanks,
> Robin
> 
> On Aug 11, 2015, at 11:20 AM, Mueller, Milton L wrote:
> 
>> Dr. Brenden Kuerbis of IGP has developed a very important analysis of the CCWG’s proposed voting distribution model, which we need to take into account when developing our comments.
>> Read it here: http://www.internetgovernance.org/2015/08/11/ccwg-community-mechanism-threatens-to-upset-icann-balance/#comment-40415 <http://www.internetgovernance.org/2015/08/11/ccwg-community-mechanism-threatens-to-upset-icann-balance/#comment-40415>
>>  
>> Dr. Milton L. Mueller
>> Professor, School of Public Policy
>> Georgia Institute of Technology
>>  
>>  
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20150812/44becb5e/attachment.htm>