[] - Gnso-newgtld-dg Update Draft Deliverables

[Robin Gross]

Thanks, Avri.  I would like to add an issue into the discussion group.  The freedom of expression protections that the GNSO Council passed and board approved were never implemented into the final new gtld policy.  We need to get them implemented - there was no hesitation by staff in implementing (and inventing new) trademark rights, why not free expression rights?  They were included in the GNSO's original policy.

Thanks,
Robin

On Apr 24, 2015, at 9:32 PM, Avri Doria wrote:

> Hi
> 
> This discussion group on future gTLD PDP is getting close to winding up.
> 
> If anybody sees anything of concern, please discuss on the list.  
> I will try to pick it up and get it into the discussion.
> 
> avri
> 
> 
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject:	[Gnso-newgtld-dg] - Update Draft Deliverables
> Date:	Thu, 23 Apr 2015 00:36:37 +0000
> From:	Steve Chan <steve.chan at icann.org>
> To:	gnso-newgtld-dg at icann.org <gnso-newgtld-dg at icann.org>
> 
> Dear DG Members,
> 
> Staff and the Co-Chairs have worked on editing the DG’s set of deliverables to incorporate suggestions from members as well as other updates. Please review the attached documents (also available on the Wiki here: https://community.icann.org/display/DGNGSR/DRAFT+Deliverables) ahead of the DG’s next call on 27 April 2015.
> Executive Summary: Adjusted the language to acknowledge that the DG's set of deliverables is slightly different than originally conceived.
> Issues/Recommendations Matrix: Integrated the Board Resolution: Annex A (yellow text) and GDD Staff input paper (green text) into the matrix to ensure that the thoughts are not lost, while being sure to differentiate between the issues raised by the DG.
> Draft Charter: Made some requested changes based on the 13 April call, which includes:
> Noting that the work should consider past efforts and that existing recommendations remain in place unless the GNSO changes them
> Strengthening language to allow for some level of flexibility in the charter for a future PDP(s) WG
> Allow for the possibility that there may not be any subsequent procedures
> We look forward to discussion of these documents on list as well as during the next DG call.
> 
> Best,
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Steven Chan
> Sr. Policy Manager
> 
> ICANN
> 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300
> Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536
> steve.chan at icann.org
> 
> direct: +1.310.301.3886
> mobile: +1.310.339.4410
> tel: +1.310.301.5800
> fax: +1.310.823.8649
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  	
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. 				
> www.avast.com
> 
> 
> <Charter_New gTLD DG_v0.1_22Apr2015.doc><New gTLD Principles_Recs_IG_Issues_17Apr2015.xlsx><New gTLD Exec Sum 22Apr2015.docx><Attached Message Part.txt>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20150425/71e00fd6/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 496 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20150425/71e00fd6/attachment.sig>