[PC-NCSG] Notes of 12 Oct NCSG PC meeting

[Olévié Kouami]

Rudi is an alternate Chair of this PC. It's a mistake to notice his
presence.


2014-10-13 14:57 GMT+00:00 Rudi Vansnick <rudi.vansnick at isoc.be>:

> Just a small first remark, I, Rudi Vansnick, was also present at the NCSG
> PC meeting, not that this is the most important issue. And Rafik's name is
> also missing.
>
> Rudi Vansnick
> Chair Non-for-Profit Operational Concerns Constituency (NPOC)
> www.npoc.org
>
> rudi.vansnick at npoc.org
> Tel : +32 (0)9 329 39 16
> Mobile : +32 (0)475 28 16 32
>
>
>
> Op 13-okt.-2014, om 07:47 heeft Maria Farrell <maria.farrell at gmail.com>
> het volgende geschreven:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Many thanks for the great turnout and discussion yesterday. As the GNSO
> Council agenda was pretty light, we had a useful and informative discussion
> on some broader topics, which I personally found very helpful - so thanks
> to everyone.
>
> All the best, Maria
>
> NCSG PC
>
> 12 Oct 2014
>
>
> Participants:
>
> Joy Liddicoat
>
> Amr El Sadr
>
> Olevie Kouami
>
> Carolos Affonso
>
> Wendy Seltzer
>
> Carlos Guttierez
>
> Niels ten Oever
>
> Lori Schulman
>
> Sam LanFranco
>
> Stephanie Perrin
>
> Maria Farrell
>
> Avri Doria
>
> Bill Drake
>
> David Cake
>
> Robin Gross
>
> Milton Mueller
>
> Magaly Pazello
>
> Klaus Stoll
>
>
> 1                     Prep for High Interest Topic SO/AC meeting
>
> a.       Role of Advisory Committees in ICANN policy-making
>
>                                                                i.      Keep
> the GAC role in the discussion, even though the agenda has been changed to
> focus less on the GAC
>
>                                                              ii.      Provide
> input to the bylaw change public comment period on changing Board voting
> threshold for rejecting GAC advice
>
>                                                             iii.      Remind
> people that GAC advice has a much shallower process than GNSO policy
>
>                                                            iv.      Find
> an opportunity to mention the accepted need for the Human Rights Advisory
> Committee
>
> b.      New gTLDs, 2nd round
>
>                                                                i.      Evaluate
> the first round before the second one begins (need clarity on where that
> point is)
>
>                                                              ii.      Developing
> country support and outreach to developing countries - we can say
> diplomatically 'we told you so' as we were not listened to on these topics
> and the consequences are clear
>
>                                                             iii.      What
> are the criteria for success or failure of the round (and programme does
> not equal success or failure of individual TLDs)? NCSG believes narrowly
> economic criteria are far too narrow and we will push to develop evaluation
> criteria that go wider, including the non-commercial and often positive
> economic implications of commercial TLDs
>
>                                                            iv.      Evaluation
> should not just focus on who got names or what TLDs there are, and also
> look at who did NOT apply and why not
>
>                                                              v.      The
> programme was overly concerned to avoid gaming, which happened anyway, and
> not concerned with many non-commercial issues
>
>                                                            vi.      The
> role of the Independent Experts needs to be looked at sharply in the review
> - they brought little useful or new to the evaluation of specific TLDs
>
>                                                           vii.      We
> should start evaluating the issues right now, i.e. the problems that have
> arisen, rather than wait to the end of the process to start looking at them
>
>                                                         viii.      We
> should propose a Programme Evaluation Framework, i.e. a logic model that
> looks at what the objectives of the programme were (or should have been)
> and measuring it up against them.
>
> 2                     GNSO Council agenda prep
>
> a.       Voting on resolutions on IRTP(D) and to adopt the charter of the
> Cross Community Working Group are expected to be largely positive.
>
>                                                                i.      Avri
> took part in the various IRTP working groups and endorsed the work.
>
>                                                              ii.       Bill,
> Avri and David gave background of the CCWG charter process and what it
> might be expected to achieve, and encouraged Council members to vote in
> favour of it.
>
> 3              Maria said as she is finishing her term as a Council
> member, she will shortly be stepping down as Chair of the NCSG PC and so we
> will need to start a process to elect a new chair. More on that anon.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>
>
>


-- 
Olévié Ayaovi Agbenyo KOUAMI
Directeur Général de GiDa-OKtetS (Représentations commerciales et négoces)
Directeur Exécutif et CEO de l'INTIC4DEV (Institut des TIC pour le
développement)
SG de ESTETIC  - Association Togolaise des professionnels des TIC (
http://www.estetic.tg)
ICANN-NPOC Communications Committee Chair (http://www.icann.org/ et
http://www.npoc.org/)
Membre du FOSSFA (www.fossfa.net) et Membre de de Internet Society (
www.isoc.org)
BP : 851 - Tél.: (228) 90 98 86 50 / (228) 98 43 27 72
Skype : olevie1 FB : @olivier.kouami.3 Twitter : #oleviek Lomé - Togo
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20141013/5ec3409b/attachment.htm>