new statement on IANA

[McTim]

It is a perfectly reasonable statement IMO.

On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> just to clarify about this statement as NCSG comment on IANA transition:
> - we had the PC meeting today and discussed about the statement as was
> requested. we made some changes suggested during the meeting.
> - this version was circulated  by Milton to the NCSG list with 24 hours for
> comments.
> - after that I will send it on behalf of NCSG to the concerned parties.
> hope that is much more clear.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Rafik
>
>
> 2014-03-23 17:51 GMT+09:00 Milton L Mueller <mueller at syr.edu>:
>>
>> Visible here:
>>
>>
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sJ0Fo_4LalYbyRuq4B3X5uf7TySIDq9Mrb3UVByoXIg/edit?usp=sharing
>
>



-- 
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel