US Government Announcement about transfer IANA functions stewardship
Amr Elsadr
aelsadr at EGYPTIG.ORG
Sun Mar 16 09:07:34 EET 2014
I agree too. Personally, I really like the submission by Milton and Brenden. I wouldn’t mind NCSG endorsing it, or at least developing a statement based on the four principles outlined in it. If anyone hasn’t read the submission and is interested to do so, check it out here: Roadmap for globalizing IANA: Four principles and a proposal for reform.
Thanks.
Amr
On Mar 16, 2014, at 2:18 PM, Avri Doria <avri at ACM.ORG> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sounds like a good plan.
>
> Though we may be able to add that we support functional separation of IANA. We may have some sort of agreement on that point in the NCSG. Though I am not sure.
>
> avri
>
>
> On 16-Mar-14 08:46, William Drake wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> On Mar 16, 2014, at 1:13 PM, Avri Doria <avri at ACM.ORG
>> <mailto:avri at ACM.ORG>> wrote:
>>
>>> While it looks like NCSG already endorsed the Brenden and Milton plan,
>>> I don't remember us doing so,
>>
>> Where does it look like this? I don’t remember it either.
>>
>> In any event, at this stage I don’t think it’s imperative that we all
>> have a shared model of precisely how the institutional arrangements of
>> the future might be configured. There will be push back or at least a
>> unmissable lack of enthusiasm from some actors and probably a campaign
>> to twist this into a domestic US political issue in advance of
>> elections. In that context, I’d think it’d be sufficient to at least
>> stand up and say clearly that we support
>> denationalization/globalization, congratulate the USG on looking
>> forward, expect an inclusive multistakeholder process of working options
>> for going forward, etc.
>>
>> Other civil society networks are already drafting and releasing
>> statements. It would be a real pity if the civil society actors who
>> actually work within ICANN and have long advocated change fail to do
>> something in parallel. I don’t care if it goes out at the constituency
>> or stakeholder group level but we ought to say something.
>>
>> Bill
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20140316/b3180674/attachment.htm>
More information about the Ncsg-discuss
mailing list