Time for Singapore meeting

[Rafik Dammak]

Hi Stephanie,

thanks for the comment, it reminds when we suggested to ICANN board and CEO
to investigate the possibility to join GNI (Global Network Initiative)
framework  for example.
can you please phrase your comment in short description so we can use it
during the discussion?
we have netmundial proposal too .

Best,

Rafik



2014-03-12 0:29 GMT+09:00 Stephanie Perrin <
stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>:

> At the risk of sounding like a one-trick pony, it seems a propitious time
> to comment to the Board that ICANN should take a more proactive stance on
> privacy protection, given the current controversy, and enact binding
> corporate rules for its global operations.  Just a statement.
> I think, in the context of what Bill is proposing, that we should use the
> time to point out that we believe in multi-stakeholderism and we go around
> the globe promoting it to our more cynical colleagues in civil society, but
> they have to give us a break.  Time to grow up and make it more real.
> cheers Stephanie
> PS and we need funding to go to Netmundial. :-)
>
> On 2014-03-11, at 6:59 AM, William Drake wrote:
>
> Hi fik
>
> Understood, but I believe we should discuss with the board the actual
> substantive focus and implementation of their advisory groups as a stand
> alone item.  Folding this into broader generic discussion of 'Top-down vs
> Bottom-up’ will result in us leaving with little real insight or engagement
> on the issues and how they’ll be addressed.
>
> Bill
>
>
>
>
> On Mar 11, 2014, at 11:40 AM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Bill,
>
> Thanks for the comment, the issue of Globalization Advisory Group is among
> the proposal #3 (I made the mistake to use the acronym GAG...). indeed it
> is new matter to discuss about with the board and understand what they are
> planning with such setup.
>
> Rafik
>
> 2014-03-11 17:57 GMT+09:00 William Drake <william.drake at uzh.ch>:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> On Mar 10, 2014, at 12:19 PM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>  For the meeting with the board, we should send to them the topics to
>> discuss , we have some proposals and would like to get membership feedback
>> and suggestions:
>>
>> * Netmundial
>>
>> * Reconsideration process for TMCH+50 (Trademark Clearing House )
>> * Top-down vs Bottom-up approaches: GAG, strategic panels, expert groups
>> vs PDP
>> * IANA/ICANN globalisation
>> * Missing Nomcom seat for NPOC
>>
>>
>> I suggest we talk to them about the President’s Globalization Advisory
>> Groups.  As this is new, important, not something we’ve talked about
>> before, and they’re the ones doing it, they might actually have something
>> to say about it.
>> http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/globalization-19feb14-en.pdf.
>>
>> Bill
>>
>
>
> ***********************************************
> William J. Drake
> International Fellow & Lecturer
>   Media Change & Innovation Division, IPMZ
>   University of Zurich, Switzerland
> Chair, Noncommercial Users Constituency,
>   ICANN, www.ncuc.org
> william.drake at uzh.ch (direct), wjdrake at gmail.com (lists),
>   www.williamdrake.org
> ***********************************************
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20140312/471a9e87/attachment.htm>