Time for Singapore meeting

[Rafik Dammak]

Hi Brenden,

thanks, we can use this wording. yes there was talk before about updating
the composition of nomcom and GNSO representation there.

Best,

Rafik


2014-03-11 21:27 GMT+09:00 Brenden Kuerbis <bkuerbis at internetgovernance.org>
:

> In a similar vein, I'd suggest we tweak the last item to request
> further information on the Board's recent action to form "a working
> group on the Nominating Committee Recruitment & Selection Process and
> Size & Composition" as reported in
> http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/resolutions-07feb14-en.htm
>  The broader context is that there is debate over how organizational
> structure (SG's, Constituencies) should relate to representation on
> Nomcom.
>
> As for the NPOC seat situation, I can seek out further information and
> provide an update in the NCSG meeting.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------
> Brenden Kuerbis
> Internet Governance Project
> http://internetgovernance.org
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 6:59 AM, William Drake <william.drake at uzh.ch>
> wrote:
> > Hi fik
> >
> > Understood, but I believe we should discuss with the board the actual
> > substantive focus and implementation of their advisory groups as a stand
> > alone item.  Folding this into broader generic discussion of 'Top-down vs
> > Bottom-up’ will result in us leaving with little real insight or
> engagement
> > on the issues and how they’ll be addressed.
> >
> > Bill
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mar 11, 2014, at 11:40 AM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Bill,
> >
> > Thanks for the comment, the issue of Globalization Advisory Group is
> among
> > the proposal #3 (I made the mistake to use the acronym GAG...). indeed
> it is
> > new matter to discuss about with the board and understand what they are
> > planning with such setup.
> >
> > Rafik
> >
> > 2014-03-11 17:57 GMT+09:00 William Drake <william.drake at uzh.ch>:
> >>
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> On Mar 10, 2014, at 12:19 PM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>  For the meeting with the board, we should send to them the topics to
> >> discuss , we have some proposals and would like to get membership
> feedback
> >> and suggestions:
> >>
> >> * Netmundial
> >>
> >> * Reconsideration process for TMCH+50 (Trademark Clearing House )
> >> * Top-down vs Bottom-up approaches: GAG, strategic panels, expert groups
> >> vs PDP
> >> * IANA/ICANN globalisation
> >> * Missing Nomcom seat for NPOC
> >>
> >>
> >> I suggest we talk to them about the President’s Globalization Advisory
> >> Groups.  As this is new, important, not something we’ve talked about
> before,
> >> and they’re the ones doing it, they might actually have something to say
> >> about it.
> http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/globalization-19feb14-en.pdf.
> >>
> >> Bill
> >
> >
> >
> > ***********************************************
> > William J. Drake
> > International Fellow & Lecturer
> >   Media Change & Innovation Division, IPMZ
> >   University of Zurich, Switzerland
> > Chair, Noncommercial Users Constituency,
> >   ICANN, www.ncuc.org
> > william.drake at uzh.ch (direct), wjdrake at gmail.com (lists),
> >   www.williamdrake.org
> > ***********************************************
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20140311/fbf0628e/attachment.htm>