Selection of NCSG representative/connector on IANA Transition coordination group.

[Seun Ojedeji]

On a lighter note, perhaps it's good to read from Milton on whether he
accepts the nomination especially considering the requirement listed by
Maria.

Cheers!

sent from Google nexus 4
kindly excuse brevity and typos.
On 25 Jun 2014 10:31, "Maria Farrell" <maria.farrell at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Thanks for this nomination, and to Avri for posting this on the discuss
> list.
>
> Here are the criteria we agreed to apply to this selection:
>
> Knowledge of Internet governance substantive issues, processes, players -
> and political 'nous' to understand agendas
> Knowledge of how IANA actually works
> Time to commit to it - process likely to be time-consuming
> Commitment to pro-actively feed back to the NCSG and transmit our views
> back to the transition coordination group
> Commitment to help communicating to broader groups in our community
>
> All the best,
>
> Maria
>
>
> On 25 June 2014 10:12, William Drake <wjdrake at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 to our ethos embodier
>>
>> On Jun 25, 2014, at 9:36 AM, Avri Doria <avri at ACM.ORG> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > This is being discussed on the NCSG Policy list, but I think it ought to
>> > also be discussed here.
>> >
>> > I have nominated Milton, my long time argument foil (we disagree as much
>> > as we agree) - and friend for the role on the IANA Transition
>> > Coordination group.
>> >
>> > I cannot think of anyone else who
>> >
>> > - better understands the issue
>> > - better understands the needs of the NCSG
>> > - who has greater influence in this area
>> > - or who has been more dedicated for as long to non commercial causes at
>> > ICANN
>> >
>> > I hope he gets the support of our membership so that the PC feels able
>> > to pick him for the role.
>> >
>> > avri
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20140625/45d1d424/attachment.htm>