US Govt on IANNA Transition: Multistakeholder, Multilateral Sectors Can Coexist

[Joana Varon]

Interesting. During NetMundial, president Dilma made a similar point in her
opening speech: multilateral+multistakeholder.

My take is that we would only solve this dilema trying to put things in
practice, as I feal that so far we dont have a proper mutistakeholder
process put in place with transparency and accountability.

Best

Joana

-----
Joana Varon Ferraz
@joana_varon
Researcher
Center for Technology and Society
Fundação Getulio Vargas

On Sunday, June 22, 2014, Sam Lanfranco <lanfran at yorku.ca> wrote:

> This is an example of the wording that the US Government is now using when
> talking about the future of Internet governance. It helps when thinking
> about the properties of a deliverable IANA transition proposal.
> Internet Governance: Multistakeholder, Multilateral Sectors Can Coexist
> *Internet Governance: Multistakeholder Consensus With Multilateral
> Affirmation**by Daniel Sepulveda**
>
> "One of the issues at the center of discussions over the future of
> Internet governance is how multilateral and multistakeholder institutions
> with an interest in working on Internet-related issues can coexist without
> duplication or conflict and without threatening to undermine the Internet
> and its promise. In an ideal world, each would learn from the other, and
> the activity of one would only add value to the other".
>
> Read more:
> http://iipdigital.usembassy.gov/st/english/article/2014/06/20140618301689.html#ixzz35O9PZiGR
>
> **Sepulveda serves as the U.S. deputy assistant secretary of state and
> coordinator for international communications and information policy in the
> Bureau of Economic and Business Affairs.*
>
> Sam Lanfranco
>


-- 
Sent from Mobile
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20140622/48ff4322/attachment.htm>