Important blog post about the ICANN Accountability CCWG

[Sam Lanfranco]

Avri,

Agreed! part of ICANN process should be, in a particular situation, to 
assess whether or not a particular search for public interest  is 
appropriate for within ICANN. or whether ICANN and others can help it 
find its appropriate process venue elsewhere. Just because something 
Internet related is important (has a public interest?), that does not 
mean it should be addressed within ICANN. Also, that does not prevent 
the ICANN community from having a voice in the dialogue elsewhere.

Sam

/On 25/12/2014 6:09 PM, Avri Doria wrote://
/
> ///
> /
> /On 25-Dec-14 15:55, Dan Krimm wrote://
> /
>> /Milton, you make a good point about competing rights: they do often
>> conflict and then we need to figure out how to balance them./
> /
> //I have often thought that the search for public interest was the 
> search for that balance of the various rights and [cultural] 
> perceptions. Something dynamic and variable.//
> / /
> //But I d believe it is definable as a process and as a goal.//
> / /
> //avri//
> / /
> / /
> / 


-- 
------------------------------------------------
"It is a disgrace to be rich and honoured
in an unjust state" -Confucius
------------------------------------------------
Dr Sam Lanfranco (Prof Emeritus & Senior Scholar)
Econ, York U., Toronto, Ontario, CANADA - M3J 1P3
email: Lanfran at Yorku.ca   Skype: slanfranco
blog:  http://samlanfranco.blogspot.com
Phone: +1 613-476-0429 cell: +1 416-816-2852

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20141225/3170563e/attachment.htm>