reconsideration request

[Tapani Tarvainen]

On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 07:19:06AM +0300, Avri Doria (avri at ACM.ORG) wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Bent out of shape because we are not following our processes?
> What an idea?  Almost worthy of a reconsideration request.
> 
> It was sent in NCSG's name.  Yet there was no process to do so.
> 
> I know it is what you and handful of others want, but we have
> Chartered processes by which we make decisions and no decision
> process, as far as I can tell, was followed.

I must support Avri here on general principles, even though
I haven't been exactly active here recently nor do I have
anything to say about this reconsideration request as such.

I would very much like to see ncsg act at least a bit more formally,
in particular to have and follow well-documented processes in its
decision-making.

-- 
Tapani Tarvainen
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20140830/b797bc6d/attachment.sig>