Fwd: [Internetgovtech] IAB Sends Comments to ICANN on the Transition NTIA=?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=99s_?=Stewardship of the IANA Functions

[Seun Ojedeji]

I agree to IAB suggestion on handling the 3 areas of the transition
separately and by their relevant interest group's community. It will
improve on the quality/relevance of input and allow for overall
transparency we all desire in the process.

Thanks

sent from Google nexus 4
kindly excuse brevity and typos.
On 30 Apr 2014 15:24, "Rafik Dammak" <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> IAB comments on the IANA process proposal.
>
> Rafik
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: IAB Chair <iab-chair at iab.org>
> Date: 2014-04-30 6:49 GMT+09:00
> Subject: [Internetgovtech] IAB Sends Comments to ICANN on the Transition
> NTIA’s Stewardship of the IANA Functions
> To: IETF Announce <ietf-announce at ietf.org>
> Cc: internetgovtech at iab.org, IAB <iab at iab.org>, IETF <ietf at ietf.org>,
> ianatransition at icann.org
>
>
> Today, the IAB sent comments regarding the “Draft Proposal, Based on
> Initial Community Feedback, of the Principles and Mechanisms and the
> Process to Develop a Proposal to Transition NTIA’s Stewardship of the IANA
> Functions”.  The comments are on the IAB web site:
>
> http://www.iab.org/wp-content/IAB-uploads/2014/04/iab-response-to-20140408-20140428a.pdf
>
> Thanks for your consideration,
>   Russ Housley
>   IAB Chair
> _______________________________________________
> Internetgovtech mailing list
> Internetgovtech at iab.org
> https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/internetgovtech
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20140430/312ebe15/attachment.htm>