New IGP Blog post on IANA transition

[Niels ten Oever]

Hi Rafik & Brenden,

Do we have a drafting team for this?

Cheers,

Niels

On 04/21/2014 08:08 PM, Rafik Dammak wrote:
> Hi Brenden,
> 
> Thanks for sharing this, we have as NCSG to respond to the comment
> regarding the draft proposal from ICANN too (the scoping document is
> part of it).
> 
> Best Regards,
> 
> Rafik 
> 
> 
> 2014-04-18 1:20 GMT+09:00 Brenden Kuerbis
> <bkuerbis at internetgovernance.org <mailto:bkuerbis at internetgovernance.org>>:
> 
>     In case you missed it, or simply haven't had time to keep up with
>     transition of the IANA functions debate, we have a new article on
>     how ICANN has attempted to preempt discussion of options by issuing
>     a narrow Scoping Document:  
> 
>     http://www.internetgovernance.org/2014/04/16/icann-anything-that-doesnt-give-iana-to-me-is-out-of-scope/
> 
>     The IGP thinks this is wrong.  Yesterday, the European Commission
>     agreed with that, saying "there should be no artificial limitation
>     in the scope of the discussion." 
> 
>     Toward the end of the article, we provide a link for a redlined
>     version of the document, which revises the scope according to the
>     NTIA's announcement:
> 
>     https://docs.google.com/document/d/1nYQwmfTB52fLwT88RpAyGd3kD69rBLXbnG5zi5IT9yw/edit
> 
>     We invite your comments or suggestions.
> 
>     Thanks!
> 
> 
> 
>     ---------------------------------------
>     Brenden Kuerbis
>     Internet Governance Project
>     http://internetgovernance.org
> 
> 


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 551 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20140423/c9f58aa3/attachment.sig>