Reply period closing on Delay of GNSO review decsion

[William Drake]

Hi


On Sep 5, 2013, at 6:42 AM, Avri Doria <AVRI at ACM.ORG> wrote:

> Hi
> 
> The reply period for the delay of the GNSO proposal ends on 6 June.  At todays' meeting there was a strong sentiment in favor of NCSG endorsing the NPOC statement.
> 
> What do people think about the following?

Look fine to me.

Thanks,

Bill
> 
> I will ask the NCSG Policy  Committee to decide by  6 September whether they beleive this should be submitted in the NCSG's name.
> 
> Please comment.
> Any objections?
> Any edits?
> 
> -----
> 
> 
> NCSG wishes to support and endorse the statement submitted by NPOC <http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-gnso-review-15jul13/msg00003.html> against any delay in the beginning the next cycle of GNSO reviews.
> 
> The NCSG also support comments submitted by: 
> 
> - ISPCP <http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-gnso-review-15jul13/msg00002.html> 
> - Google <http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-gnso-review-15jul13/msg00001.html>
> 
> against any delay in the beginning of the next cyle of GNSO reviews.
> 
> The NCSG wishes to add the following comments to this Reply:
> 
> We beleive that with the ATRT2 to publish its report by the end of 2013, the timing is perfect for the process to begin early in 2014 without any further delay.
> 
> 
> -----
> 
> I can't take complete silence as consent.  silence only works as consent when other people are being noisy.
> 
> so please say something
> 
> avri



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20130905/a55dc8a3/attachment.htm>