Sign-On Statement regarding the 2014 Internet Governance Summit in Brazil

William Drake william.drake at UZH.CH
Sun Oct 27 20:46:58 EET 2013


It's not, really.  Surveillance revelations lit the match and changed the political landscape, but the what's been discussed thus far is a broader focus on some mix of principles, USG role in CIR, orphan issues.  Surveillance is being pursued in UNGA.

Bill



On Oct 28, 2013, at 12:32 AM, Jorge Amodio <jmamodio at gmail.com> wrote:

> 
> NO. If the primary focus is surveillance, now if they are willing to widen the discussion to universal rights and other issues associated with IG, and governments obsession to gain control, and call for generating an open agenda we are talking about something totally different,
> 
> Regards
> Jorge
>  
> 
> 
> On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 5:22 AM, avri <avri at acm.org> wrote:
> http://igcaucus.org/sign-on.html
> 
> Do we want to endorse as ncsg?
> 
> avri
> 
> Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20131027/0fd83e44/attachment.htm>


More information about the Ncsg-discuss mailing list