NCSG Comment on ICANN's Whois Privacy & Proxy Abuse Study - any objections?

[Avri Doria]

On 13 Nov 2013, at 18:01, Kathy Kleiman wrote:

> We resolved Milton's issues last night. Amr and I worked with him on the edits, and incorporated every one he wanted. He's en route today to BA.


From his note in the text, I did not perceive that.  But I am willing to take assurances that he was satisfied with the current language from anyone who feels they can quote him saying that.


But since it is the PC that makes the final decisions, if I (or Wendy who is the actual chair instead of the alternate chair) beleive there is a rough consensus for submitting it as an NCSG statement, I will do so.  But I feel I need to hear from more members of the PC before I can do that.


avri


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 495 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20131113/a3f96853/attachment.sig>