NCSG Comment on ICANN's Whois Privacy & Proxy Abuse Study

[Amr Elsadr]

Thanks McTim,

I’ve replaced “more study of Whois privacy and proxy abuse should be conducted” with “more Whois privacy and proxy abuse research should be conducted” in the last paragraph. I hope that’s what you were referring to.

Thanks again.

Amr

On Nov 11, 2013, at 1:27 PM, McTim <dogwallah at GMAIL.COM> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 8:05 AM, Amr Elsadr <aelsadr at egyptig.org> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I’ve taken a stab at drafting a comment on the ICANN Whois Privacy & Proxy
>> Abuse Study. The public comment period is over, but we have until November
>> 13th to submit a statement during the reply period. At this point, I would
>> like to know if members of the NCSG as well as the policy committee are
>> willing to endorse this statement, and whether or not there are any
>> suggested changes anyone feels need to be made.
>> 
>> I’ve drafted the statement on a Google doc, which you can find here:
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RS5Ze_0TU4ymdq0N8tROKrr2Vg-SpBp5ZEXTLUr7j84/edit?usp=sharing
> 
> 
> 
> Instead of "Whois privacy and proxy service abuse should be conducted"
> 
> I think you need to add the word "research" so it becomes:
> 
> "Whois privacy and proxy service abuse research should be conducted"
> 
> 
> Then it is fine by me.
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> 
> McTim
> "A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
> route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel