GAC comments - and a note on my rhetorical excesses

[McTim]

On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 1:27 PM, Milton L Mueller <mueller at syr.edu> wrote:

> Today in domain incite the writer starts his blog post with:
> " For the last few weeks I've been attempting to write a sensible analysis
> of the Governmental Advisory Committee's advice on new gTLDs without
> resorting to incredulity, hyperbole or sarcasm"
>
> Exactly what I felt when I took on the task!!
>
> So it took him a few weeks to work it out of his system. Can you all
> forgive me - or perhaps respect me - for taking only one week?
>
> I have revised the GAC comments. They are tamer. They eliminated one
> mistake that Kathy pointed out to me. the bow to division within NCSG
> regarding closed generics. But they still drive home what are absolutely
> essential points that MUST be made, and made strongly, in this important
> comment period. Please take a fresh look.
>
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1d6GT0zqLjU6e7Js-TE2Gjlm_-B5xvhE5CrRPZSV3oV4/edit?usp=sharing



I am happy with the re-write in terms of tone and substance.

It is important that we make a solid statement about this to the Board, as
it gives them political "cover" to say no to the GAC.


-- 
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route
indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20130509/eb4c3efb/attachment.htm>