ICANN Board dismisses NCSG reconsideration request on ICANN violating process by adopting TM+50 policy

[Norbert Klein]

Thanks, Robin.

Agreeing and supporting next moves.


Norbert

On 7/4/2013 1:32 AM, Robin Gross wrote:
>
> ICANN New gtld program committee adopted BGC's revised rationale 
> dismissing NCSG's request for reconsideration.  We should file for an 
> Independent Review Panel determination and ask ICANN and/or the 
> arbitrators to waive our costs, which are otherwise prohibitive. 
>  There is no accountability "within" ICANN, as this situation has 
> demonstrated.  We need to go outside of ICANN to get any constraints 
> on ICANN's lawlessness.  - Robin
>
> 2 July 2013 - Resolution Approved by ICANN Board New GTLD Cmte:
>
> http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/resolutions-new-gtld-02jul13-en.htm#1.a
>
>
>         Revised BGC Recommendation on Reconsideration Request 13-3
>
> Whereas, the Noncommercial Users Stakeholders Group's ("NCSG") 
> Reconsideration Request, Request 13-3, sought reconsideration of the 
> staff action of 20 March 2013 regarding "Trademark Claims Protections 
> for Previously Abused Names".
>
> Whereas, the BGC considered the issues raised in Reconsideration 
> Request 13-3, as well as the issues brought to and discussed by the 
> GNSO Council regarding some of the language in the BGC's Recommendation.
>
> Whereas, the BGC revoked its initial recommendation, and issued a 
> Revised BGC Recommendation on Reconsideration Request 13-3, which 
> ultimately recommended that no further action was warranted with 
> respect to Request 13-3.
>
> Resolved (2013.07.02.NG01), the New gTLD Program Committee adopts the 
> Revised BGC Recommendation on Reconsideration Request 13-3 
> <http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/governance/reconsideration/recommendation-ncsg-25jun13-en.pdf> 
> [PDF, 142 KB].
>
> Resolved (2013.07.02.NG02), the New gTLD Program Committee directs 
> ICANN's President and CEO to assure that the issues raised within 
> Request 13-3 are brought to the ongoing community discussion on policy 
> versus implementation within ICANN.
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20130703/8395007e/attachment.htm>