Questions/Options for Protection of IOC/Red Cross Names at Top Level

Avri Doria avri at ACM.ORG
Sat Feb 4 18:54:49 EET 2012


On 4 Feb 2012, at 03:38, William Drake wrote:

> So returning to KK's original message, I am for  Option 1: Recommend no changes to Guidebook and reject GAC Proposal, with an objection on process and precedent grounds complimenting the substantive case.

In terms of changes to the Guidebook.

Except that I think changing the Guidebook now breaks the GNSO requirements for a stable and predictable process, I would favor changing the guidebook by eliminating the BoardStaff policy that it currently contains making an exception for the IOC/IFRC.

avri


More information about the Ncsg-discuss mailing list