<div dir="ltr">Dear Julf,<div>I am onboard with this response.</div><div><br></div><div>Thank you,</div><div>Benjamin </div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 8:19 PM Juan Manuel Rojas <<a href="mailto:jumaropi@yahoo.com">jumaropi@yahoo.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div><div style="font-family:"Helvetica Neue",Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"><div><div dir="ltr">Hi Julf, <br></div><div dir="ltr">It's OK for me</div><div dir="ltr"><br></div><div dir="ltr"> Regards<br></div><div><br></div><div><div style="font-size:13px;font-family:Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif"><div><div id="m_1169725017204928149ydpbc80bd55yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1467397914851_28423"><span style="font-size:small"><b>JUAN MANUEL ROJAS, M.Sc.</b><br style="color:rgb(69,69,69)"></span><div><span style="font-size:small"><font size="2" face="Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif" color="#808080" style="background-color:inherit"><span id="m_1169725017204928149ydpbc80bd55yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1467397914851_29214">Director - MINKA DIGITAL Colombia</span></font></span></div></div><div id="m_1169725017204928149ydpbc80bd55yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1467397914851_28423" dir="ltr"><font size="2" face="Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif" color="#808080"><span style="font-size:small">NPOC Chair - NCSG/GNSO<br></span></font></div><div id="m_1169725017204928149ydpbc80bd55yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1467397914851_28423" dir="ltr"><span style="font-size:small;color:rgb(128,128,128);font-family:Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif">M.Sc. Information Technology</span><br></div><div id="m_1169725017204928149ydpbc80bd55yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1467397914851_28423" dir="ltr"><br></div><div dir="ltr"><font size="2" face="Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif" color="#808080"><span style="font-size:small"><span><font size="2" face="Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif" color="#808080" style="background-color:inherit"><span style="font-size:small">Registered Linux User No.<b><span>533108.</span></b></span></font></span><br></span></font></div><div dir="ltr"><a href="http://www.jmanurojas.com" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.jmanurojas.com</a> <br></div><div id="m_1169725017204928149ydpbc80bd55yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1467397914851_28423" dir="ltr"><span style="font-size:small"><br></span></div><div id="m_1169725017204928149ydpbc80bd55yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1467397914851_28423" dir="ltr"><span style="font-size:small"><font face="Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif" style="background-color:inherit"><i>Cel. +57 301 743 56 00<br>Instagram: jmanurojas</i></font><br id="m_1169725017204928149ydpbc80bd55yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1467397914851_29244" style="color:rgb(69,69,69)"></span></div></div><div dir="ltr"><br><div><tt>-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----<br>
Version: 3.1<br>
GIT d- s: a+ C+++ UL P+ L+++ !E !W+++ !N !o K+++ w-- !O M- V PS+ PE-- Y+
PGP+ t+ 5 X++ R tv+ b+ DI D G e+++(+++)>+++ h+ r++ y+
<br>
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
</tt></div><div><br></div></div><div style="font-size:13px;font-family:arial,helvetica,clean,sans-serif"><br><br><br><br></div> </div></div></div>
<div><br></div><div><br></div>
</div><div id="m_1169725017204928149yahoo_quoted_8154923899">
<div style="font-family:"Helvetica Neue",Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:rgb(38,40,42)">
<div>
El martes, 11 de junio de 2024, 04:51:50 p. m. GMT+2, Johan Helsingius <<a href="mailto:julf@julf.com" target="_blank">julf@julf.com</a>> escribió:
</div>
<div><br></div>
<div><br></div>
<div><div dir="ltr">Benjamnin and Juan,<br clear="none"><br clear="none">Are you OK with the response being a joint NCSG/NCUC/NPOC one?<br clear="none"><br clear="none"> Julf<br clear="none"><br clear="none"><div id="m_1169725017204928149yqtfd63068"><br clear="none">On 11/06/2024 15:50, Johan Helsingius via NCSG-PC wrote:<br clear="none">> Here is my suggested response to Greg's question about the NomCom<br clear="none">> changes.<br clear="none">> <br clear="none">> Google doc at: <br clear="none">> <a shape="rect" href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1z2EIBHxO68xOklCFqw44Df8f225QCR94eDobzlXZ9CI/edit?usp=sharing" target="_blank">https://docs.google.com/document/d/1z2EIBHxO68xOklCFqw44Df8f225QCR94eDobzlXZ9CI/edit?usp=sharing</a><br clear="none">> <br clear="none">> <br clear="none">> The question is "Do you believe there would be any objections from your<br clear="none">> groups, and potentially delegates that you have already identified, to<br clear="none">> proceeding with a simple path forward in which we randomly select three<br clear="none">> of seven GNSO delegates to serve one-year terms?"<br clear="none">> <br clear="none">> We do find that the recommendations and internally inconsistent and<br clear="none">> should not have been approved. On one hand the recommendations<br clear="none">> call for staggered terms in order to provide continuity and to<br clear="none">> avoid an "all new faces" situation, but then on the other hand<br clear="none">> force all representatives to be new appointees (with reappointing<br clear="none">> existing representatives specifically not allowed) at the beginning<br clear="none">> of the new term structure.<br clear="none">> <br clear="none">> We also note that the random selection of lengths of initial<br clear="none">> terms might be appropriate for an AC like ALAC as they don't<br clear="none">> have multiple constituencies with diverging interests and<br clear="none">> uneven representation. We don't think it is appropriate<br clear="none">> for the GNSO.<br clear="none">> <br clear="none">> In addition to the issue about initial terms, we also want<br clear="none">> to once again note another reason the recommendations should<br clear="none">> not have been approved. In the draft recommendations there<br clear="none">> was almost to the end a recommendation for a NomCom rebalancing.<br clear="none">> It is our understanding that that recommendation was removed<br clear="none">> at the last moment, based on a vote taken at one single meeting<br clear="none">> where none of our constituencies were represented. We don't<br clear="none">> feel that is how consensus policy should be decided.<br clear="none">> <br clear="none">> On behalf of the NCSG, NCUC and NPOC,<br clear="none">> <br clear="none">> Julf Helsingius, NCSG Chair</div><br clear="none">> <br clear="none">> <br clear="none">> <br clear="none">> _______________________________________________<br clear="none">> NCSG-PC mailing list<br clear="none">> <a shape="rect" href="mailto:NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is" target="_blank">NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is</a><br clear="none">> <a shape="rect" href="https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc" target="_blank">https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc</a><div id="m_1169725017204928149yqtfd71100"><br clear="none"></div></div></div>
</div>
</div></div></blockquote></div>