<div dir="ltr">Hi all,<div><br></div><div>if there is no strong objection in coming hours, I will submit the attached comment.</div><div><br></div><div>Best,</div><div><br></div><div>Rafik<br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">Le ven. 5 oct. 2018 à 23:51, Martin Pablo Silva Valent <<a href="mailto:mpsilvavalent@gmail.com">mpsilvavalent@gmail.com</a>> a écrit :<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="auto">All my support to this comment. <div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Martín</div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Fri, Oct 5, 2018, 11:42 Kathryn Kleiman <<a href="mailto:kathy@kathykleiman.com" target="_blank">kathy@kathykleiman.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p>I'm an observer, but I support. Important to submit!</p>
<p>Kathy<br>
</p>
<div class="m_-6644491086184815438m_-6678167149340082323moz-cite-prefix">On 10/5/2018 10:34 AM, Rafik Dammak
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">hi all,
<div><br>
</div>
<div>this a reminder about reviewing this draft comment <a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1i5n7qp3MdZ6XTao4bbfMLR5BrBlX-NQ_c9mu_cGLs1I/edit" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://docs.google.com/document/d/1i5n7qp3MdZ6XTao4bbfMLR5BrBlX-NQ_c9mu_cGLs1I/edit</a></div>
<div>I added some bits I mentioned before. the deadline for
submission is today.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Best,</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Rafik<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr">Le jeu. 4 oct. 2018 à 09:15, Rafik Dammak
<<a href="mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">rafik.dammak@gmail.com</a>>
a écrit :<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div dir="ltr" class="m_-6644491086184815438m_-6678167149340082323gmail-m_-3473748315002655856gmail_signature">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>Hi,</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Thanks, Farznaeh for the short draft. I
reviewed the paper again and what it is
suggesting as options. one issue is that
some are not related to what we got mainly
in the first paper about timelines:</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>1- proposed timeline for ATRT is something we
can support. the ATRT will start its work on
January 2019 and in fact, GNSO is confirming the
selection (September Council meeting discussion).
no issue here.</div>
<div>2- the proposed scope for ATRT to discuss
"streamlining" specific reviews. that is of high
concern as it is limit the de factiATRT scope and
also impact other specific reviews. I think we
should add a comment on that front to not prevent
the ATRT from setting its own scope and what
covers as areas such as review ATRT2
recommendations and linking to WS1&2
recommendations.</div>
<div>3- to "streamline" organizational review and
starting a consultation process led by the
board(OEC), no particular issue here in term of
the process but we will see with what is proposed.
the outcome will impact us directly as it concerns
the GNSO review too that should start likely in
2020. one possible comment will be to avoid having
the process as board and staff led only and ensure
community full participation (they mention
consultation but...)</div>
<div>4- operating standards for specific review, we
missed commenting on the first draft, the concern
would be about the ability to comment on the
second draft and what is proposed here. for
reminders the operating standards covered area
like the scoping, formation and other operating
procedures for review teams. one possible comment
is to request that the second version of operating
standards should go through a public comment and
consultation e.g. public session.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>do you think we can include those items?</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>let's share the current draft in NCSG list and
I moved it to the google doc <a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1i5n7qp3MdZ6XTao4bbfMLR5BrBlX-NQ_c9mu_cGLs1I/edit" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://docs.google.com/document/d/1i5n7qp3MdZ6XTao4bbfMLR5BrBlX-NQ_c9mu_cGLs1I/edit</a>.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Best,</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Rafik</div>
<div><br>
<div>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr">Le jeu. 4 oct. 2018 à 04:19,
Ayden Férdeline <<a href="mailto:icann@ferdeline.com" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">icann@ferdeline.com</a>>
a écrit :<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div>Thanks, Farzi. Please find below in red
some suggested edits:
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>The
Non-Commercial Stakeholders Group is
<s>we are</s></span><span> re-submitting
our comments </span><span>dated
31 July 2018
pertaining</span><span> </span><s><span>on</span></s><span> to</span><span> the </span><span>future
of</span><span> short</span><span>-</span><span>term</span><span>[1] </span><span>and long</span><span>-</span><span>term</span><span>[2]
specific and
organizational</span><span> review</span><span>s</span><span>. We </span><span>were <s>are</s></span><span> </span><span>disappointed
<s>surprised</s>
</span><span>that the </span><span>B<s>b</s></span><span>oard </span><span>in its
10 August 2018 Organizational
Effectiveness Committee meeting[3]
formed the view <s><a href="https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/minutes-oec-2018-08-10-en" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank"><span style="color:red">(in OEC
meeting)</span></a> decided</s></span><span> that there was </span><span>insufficient
<s>not enough</s>
</span><span>consensus </span><span>to move
forward.</span><span> </span><s><span>on
short and long
term reviews due to limited
comments<a href="https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/report-comments-reviews-long-term-timeline-16aug18-en.pdf" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank"><span style="color:red"> (a total of
9 but from two ACs
(ALAC and SSAC)</span></a> and
Supporting organizations (GNSO and
CCNSO)
and most of GNSO stakeholder
groups and constituencies).</span></s><span> The Board's
decision to </span><span>gather
further community
input through an additional comment
window is disappointing, because <s>ask
for
more comments despite the fact
that clearly</s></span><span>
there was consensus among the
submitted comments</span><span>,
and reopening this topic</span><span> puts a great
strain on
a community of volunteers with
limited time </span><span>and
resources. <s> In parallel with the
effectiveness of Policy
Development
Processes, the Board should also
consider how many issues it
re-opens and
instructs the community to work
on.</s> In future when reopening
an issue for
further input, w<s>W</s></span><span>e </span><s><span>also</span></s><span> </span><span>ask th</span><span>at<s>e</s></span><span> </span><span>the</span><span> Board </span><s><span>to</span></s><span> </span><span>clearly state its
method of gauging consensus </span><span>in <s>when</s></span><span> evaluating
public
comment</span><s><span>s</span></s><span>
submissions and outline
why it believes additional input is
required</span><span>.
</span><span>Thank
you. <s>Otherwise, it can
arbitrarily
re-open issues.</s></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>[1] <a href="https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/comments-specific-reviews-short-term-timeline-14may18/2018q3/000009.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/comments-specific-reviews-short-term-timeline-14may18/2018q3/000009.html</a></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>[2] <a href="https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/comments-reviews-long-term-timeline-14may18/2018q3/000007.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/comments-reviews-long-term-timeline-14may18/2018q3/000007.html</a></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>[3] <a href="https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/minutes-oec-2018-08-10-en" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/minutes-oec-2018-08-10-en</a></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
<div>Best wishes,</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Ayden</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
<div><br>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>On 3 Oct 2018, at 19:48,
farzaneh badii <<a href="mailto:farzaneh.badii@gmail.com" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">farzaneh.badii@gmail.com</a>>
wrote:</div>
<br class="m_-6644491086184815438m_-6678167149340082323gmail-m_-3473748315002655856gmail-m_7954375441590849199Apple-interchange-newline">
<div>
<div dir="ltr">
<div style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">
<div>Hi all,</div>
<div>I wrote this paragraph
to be added as an
introduction to the
resubmission of our
comments. Please see
below. Also I suggest
Rafik share it with the
mailing list after
receiving your comments
tomorrow. we have to
submit on Friday.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>we are re-submitting
our comments on the short
term and long term review.
We are surprised that the
board <a href="https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/minutes-oec-2018-08-10-en" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">(in
OEC meeting)</a> decided
that there was not enough
consensus on short and
long term reviews due to
limited comments<a href="https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/report-comments-reviews-long-term-timeline-16aug18-en.pdf" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank"> (a
total of 9 but from two
ACs (ALAC and SSAC)</a> and
Supporting organizations
(GNSO and CCNSO) and most
of GNSO stakeholder
groups and
constituencies). The
Board's decision to ask
for more comments despite
the fact that clearly
there was consensus among
the submitted comments
puts a great strain on a
community of volunteers
with limited time. In
parallel with the
effectiveness of Policy
Development Processes, the
Board should also consider
how many issues it
re-opens and instructs the
community to work on. We
also ask the Board to
clearly state its method
of gauging consensus when
evaluating public
comments. Otherwise, it
can arbitrarily re-open
issues.</div>
<div style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif"><br>
</div>
<div style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif"><br>
</div>
<div style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif"><br>
</div>
<div style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif"><br>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div dir="ltr" class="m_-6644491086184815438m_-6678167149340082323gmail-m_-3473748315002655856gmail-m_7954375441590849199gmail_signature">
<div dir="ltr">
<div><font face="verdana,
sans-serif">Farzaneh
</font></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
_______________________________________________<br>
NCSG-PC mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc</a><br>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="m_-6644491086184815438m_-6678167149340082323mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<pre class="m_-6644491086184815438m_-6678167149340082323moz-quote-pre">_______________________________________________
NCSG-PC mailing list
<a class="m_-6644491086184815438m_-6678167149340082323moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is</a>
<a class="m_-6644491086184815438m_-6678167149340082323moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
</div>
_______________________________________________<br>
NCSG-PC mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc</a><br>
</blockquote></div>
_______________________________________________<br>
NCSG-PC mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is" target="_blank">NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc</a><br>
</blockquote></div></div></div>