<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class="">I read it over the weekend, I found it more than fair. Most of you already know my views on the matter.<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Cheers,</div><div class="">Martín<br class=""><div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On 20 May 2018, at 20:14, Rafik Dammak <<a href="mailto:rafik.dammak@GMAIL.COM" class="">rafik.dammak@GMAIL.COM</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div dir="ltr" class="">Hi all,<br class=""><br class="">please review asap and check the latest version of the letter so we can consider the endorsement. if there is no objection by Monday 23:59UTC, we will consider as approved by NCSG PC.<div class="">Thanks,</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Best,</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Rafik</div><div class=""><br class=""><br class=""><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="">Le ven. 11 mai 2018 à 19:10, Ayden Férdeline <<a href="mailto:icann@ferdeline.com" class="">icann@ferdeline.com</a>> a écrit :<br class=""></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="">Hi all,<br class=""></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">As you may be aware, the Contracted Parties House sent a letter to ICANN org recently in relation to the critical ALAC Review, whose recommendations seem to have been ignored: <br class=""></div><div class=""><a href="https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/bunton-to-chalaby-07may18-en.pdf" target="_blank" class="">https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/bunton-to-chalaby-07may18-en.pdf</a><br class=""></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">I have drafted an NCSG response; a first draft is here:<br class=""></div><div class=""><a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1oDVkLsr-jx_yPBRQ9gepGe2MQPIGbUmXJS9PplEBXzc/edit?usp=sharing" target="_blank" class="">https://docs.google.com/document/d/1oDVkLsr-jx_yPBRQ9gepGe2MQPIGbUmXJS9PplEBXzc/edit?usp=sharing</a><br class=""></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">I'm happy to receive edits and comments today or tomorrow. However I will be offline Sunday and most of next week at the RIPE meeting in Marseille, so if any comments come in during this time, I will ask the NCSG Chair if she can please resolve them.<br class=""></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">That said, I think it would be advantageous to get this comment finalised and sent to the Board before their Vancouver workshop tomorrow. I know this is a very tight turnaround, and I'm not sure we can manage it, but just a thought...<br class=""></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Best wishes,<br class=""></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Ayden</div>_______________________________________________<br class="">
NCSG-PC mailing list<br class="">
<a href="mailto:NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is" target="_blank" class="">NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is</a><br class="">
<a href="https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" class="">https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc</a><br class="">
</blockquote></div></div></div>
_______________________________________________<br class="">NCSG-PC mailing list<br class=""><a href="mailto:NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is" class="">NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is</a><br class="">https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc<br class=""></div></blockquote></div><br class=""></div></body></html>