<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_quote">hi all,</div><div class="gmail_quote"><br></div><div class="gmail_quote">things are still moving around GDPR discussion and models. IPC has a new model, that may differ from previous proposals <a href="http://www.ipconstituency.org/assets/docs/WHOIS%20Access%20Accreditation%20Process%201.3%5B1%5D.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.ipconstituency.org/<wbr>assets/docs/WHOIS%20Access%<wbr>20Accreditation%20Process%201.<wbr>3%5B1%5D.pdf</a> . We got so many moving pieces in same time (e.g as mentioned by Ayden the meeting with Article29 WP <a href="https://www.icann.org/news/blog/data-protection-privacy-issues-update-discussion-with-article-29-en">https://www.icann.org/news/blog/data-protection-privacy-issues-update-discussion-with-article-29-en</a>) and request fro guidance from DPAs <a href="https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2018-03-28-en">https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2018-03-28-en</a></div><div class="gmail_quote"><br></div><div class="gmail_quote">we should review this model and respond.</div><div class="gmail_quote"><br></div><div class="gmail_quote">Best,</div><div class="gmail_quote"><br></div><div class="gmail_quote">Rafik</div><div class="gmail_quote"><br></div><div class="gmail_quote"> </div></div>