<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div>My take is sending the 3 names because they all applied within the set deadline, hence they deserve the same chance to be treated fairly.</div><div id="AppleMailSignature"><br></div><div id="AppleMailSignature">I encourage everyone to review the nomination from Pascal and have their say. Sending 2, then another one doesn't look good for me and this will weaken the chances for the 3rd candidate to be considered by the ssc.</div><div id="AppleMailSignature"><br></div><div id="AppleMailSignature">Thanks,</div><div id="AppleMailSignature">Arsene<br><br><div>-----------------</div><div>Arsène Tungali,</div><div><a href="http://about.me/ArseneTungali">about.me/ArseneTungali</a></div><div>+243 993810967</div><div>GPG: 523644A0</div><div>Goma, Democratic Republic of Congo</div><div><br></div>Sent from my iPhone (excuse typos)</div><div><br>On Sep 9, 2017, at 12:18 AM, Rafik Dammak <<a href="mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com">rafik.dammak@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra">Hi,</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Thanks, I see we have support to send the 2 names as endorsed to SSC.<br>We got an extra application lately and not sure that everyone has time to review it.</div><div class="gmail_extra">there is no limit to send 3 names. however, I think that sending many names will weaken their chances of those candidatures at SSC deliberation since as Stakeholder group we are not championing clearly for one. that won't make NCSG representatives to SSC easier either give them a clear guidance from their group.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">for now, I will send Julf and Paul applications by the deadline. if other PC members weigh in and also support sending Pascal application in coming hours, we can submit hs endorsment afterward.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Best,</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Rafik</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">2017-09-09 3:04 GMT+09:00 Dr. Tatiana Tropina <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:t.tropina@mpicc.de" target="_blank">t.tropina@mpicc.de</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
  
    
  
  <div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <p>Hi Rafik and all,</p>
    <p>I support.</p>
    <p>Cheers,</p>
    <p>Tanya <br>
    </p><div><div class="m_-9127491023014464278h5">
    <br>
    <div class="m_-9127491023014464278m_-3199718501450113841moz-cite-prefix">On 08/09/17 14:28, Rafik Dammak wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite">
      
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div class="gmail_extra">Hi,</div>
        <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
        </div>
        <div class="gmail_extra">due to the time constraint and since we
          have 2 candidates, we can endorse both and send their
          applications to SSC. if there is no objection, I can submit
          them just before 23:59UTC.</div>
        <div class="gmail_extra">looking to hear from other PC members.</div>
        <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
        </div>
        <div class="gmail_extra">Best,</div>
        <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
        </div>
        <div class="gmail_extra">Rafik</div>
        <div class="gmail_extra">
          <br>
          <div class="gmail_quote">2017-09-08 16:50 GMT+09:00 Ayden
            Férdeline <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:icann@ferdeline.com" target="_blank">icann@ferdeline.com</a>></span>:<br>
            <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
              <div>Hi,</div>
              <div> <br>
              </div>
              <div>I propose endorsing both. We are only asked, I
                believe, to support their candidacies — we have not been
                delegated the responsibility as PC of selecting the
                liaison. </div>
              <div> <br>
              </div>
              <div>Best wishes,</div>
              <div> <br>
              </div>
              <div id="m_-9127491023014464278m_-3199718501450113841m_1504467033972945662protonmail_mobile_signature_block">Ayden
                Férdeline <br>
                Sent from ProtonMail Mobile</div>
              <div> <br>
                <div>
                  <div> <br>
                  </div>
                  On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 8:41 am, Arsène Tungali <<a href="mailto:arsenebaguma@gmail.com" target="_blank">arsenebaguma@gmail.com</a>>
                  wrote:</div>
                <blockquote class="m_-9127491023014464278m_-3199718501450113841m_1504467033972945662protonmail_quote" type="cite">So how are we doing this? Do we vote by a
                  formal poll or are we just posting on here?
                  ----------------- Arsène Tungali, <a href="http://about.me/ArseneTungali" target="_blank">about.me/ArseneTungali</a>
                  <a href="tel:+243%20993%20810%20967" value="+243993810967" target="_blank">+243 993810967</a>
                  GPG: 523644A0 Goma, Democratic Republic of Congo Sent
                  from my iPhone (excuse typos) > On Sep 8, 2017, at
                  7:15 AM, Tapani Tarvainen wrote: > > Re-sending
                  with the attachment. > > Tapani > > -----
                  Forwarded message from Paul Rosenzweig ----- > >
                  Dear Tapani (and Farzaneh as incoming Chair) > >
                  I am writing to request that you consider endorsing me
                  to be the GNSO > Liaison to the GAC. My current SOI
                  is here: > <a href="https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/Paul+Rosenzweig+SOI" target="_blank">https://community.icann.org/di<wbr>splay/gnsosoi/Paul+Rosenzweig+<wbr>SOI</a>
                  > > My completed application template follows:
                  > > APPLICATION TEMPLATE > > Name Paul
                  Rosenzweig > Affiliation The Heritage
                  Foundation/Red Branch > Consulting -- part of the
                  NCSG > > Please provide an overview of your
                  experience/expertise with GNSO policy > development
                  processes: Since 2014, I have been an active >
                  member of the CCWG-A in both WS1 and WS2 regarding
                  accountability mechanisms > related to the ICANN
                  transition. As such I have participated in the full
                  > gamut of related GNSO/NCSG policy issue that are
                  of applicability to that > context. Given my legal
                  background, I have particularly focused on legal >
                  issues -- viz, ICANN's revised mission statement, the
                  new Independent Review > Process, and ongoing
                  considerations of jurisdictional issues. I have been,
                  > and remain, especially focused on areas where the
                  influence of the GAC seems > to reflect
                  governmental interests that are inconsistent with GNSO
                  policy. > > Please provide an overview of your
                  Previous engagements in GNSO work in a > leadership
                  capacity: I have not had a previous opportunity to
                  serve in > the GNSO or NCSG in a leadership
                  capacity. This is the first instance in > which I
                  have volunteered for such a position. > > Please
                  describe your familiarity with GAC processes,
                  including GAC > engagement in GNSO policy
                  development: As part of my work > with the CCWG-A I
                  came to be intimately familiar with GAC processes for
                  > engaging in GNSO policy development. I suspect
                  that few in the GNSO have > paid quite as much
                  attention as I have to the GAC's rules of operation,
                  its > definition of consensus, and the ways in
                  which it is permitted to influence > ICANN policy.
                  Indeed the changes to those processes were one of the
                  > particular focuses of my interest in the CCWG-A
                  and one of the reasons I was > skeptical of the
                  ultimate product of the CCWG and the resulting changes
                  to > ICANN's methods for considering GAC advice. I
                  remain of the view that GAC > engagement in GNSO
                  policy development is essential but that it should be
                  > accomplished through established GAC-GNSO liaison
                  procedures and not through > extra-procedural fiat.
                  By way of example, > I have been vocal in my view
                  that the GAC's intervention with the Board >
                  regarding two letter second level top level domains
                  was procedurally > improper (and also disappointed
                  that the GNSO liaison to the GAC had not > alerted
                  the GNSO to this issue earlier. [And, though
                  neutrality is a > hallmark of a good liaison, I
                  should also make clear that I find GAC claims >
                  that second level two-letter domains should be
                  restricted deeply > unpersuasive and antithetical
                  to policies that animate the NCSG and the > GNSO].
                  > > Please provide any other information that
                  demonstrates your qualifications > for this
                  position: It is perhaps of relevance that I have a
                  > history of service in the US government and thus
                  a reasonable understanding > of the role of
                  governments. In the 2005-09 time period I twice served
                  as > the Acting Assistant Secretary for
                  International Affairs at the Department > of
                  Homeland Security, and thus experience in
                  international diplomatic > contexts. I attach a
                  full resume for your consideration. > > I would
                  be happy to answer any further questions you or other
                  members of the > NCSG might have. > > Regards
                  > Paul > > Paul Rosenzweig > Red Branch
                  Consulting, PLLC > 509 C St. NE > Washington, DC
                  20002 > <a href="mailto:paul.rosenzweig@redbranchconsulting.com" target="_blank">paul.rosenzweig@redbranchconsu<wbr>lting.com</a>
                  > O: <a href="tel:+1%20202-547-0660" value="+12025470660" target="_blank">+1 (202) 547-0660</a> > M: <a href="tel:+1%20202-329-9650" value="+12023299650" target="_blank">+1 (202)
                    329-9650</a> > VOIP: <a href="tel:+1%20202-738-1739" value="+12027381739" target="_blank">+1 (202) 738-1739</a> > <a href="http://www.redbranchconsulting.com" target="_blank">www.redbranchconsulting.com</a> >
                  <a href="http://www.paulrosenzweigesq.com" target="_blank">www.paulrosenzweigesq.com</a> >
                  My PGP Key: > <a href="https://keys.mailvelope.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x9A830097CA066684" target="_blank">https://keys.mailvelope.com/pk<wbr>s/lookup?op=get&search=0x9A830<wbr>097CA066684</a>
                  > > > > ----- End forwarded message -----
                  > > ______________________________<wbr>_________________
                  > NCSG-PC mailing list > <a href="mailto:NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is" target="_blank">NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is</a>
                  > <a href="https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc" target="_blank">https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/<wbr>listinfo/ncsg-pc</a>
                  ______________________________<wbr>_________________
                  NCSG-PC mailing list <a href="mailto:NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is" target="_blank">NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is</a>
                  <a href="https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc" target="_blank">https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/<wbr>listinfo/ncsg-pc</a>
                </blockquote>
              </div>
              <br>
              ______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
              NCSG-PC mailing list<br>
              <a href="mailto:NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is" target="_blank">NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is</a><br>
              <a href="https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/<wbr>listinfo/ncsg-pc</a><br>
              <br>
            </blockquote>
          </div>
          <br>
        </div>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="m_-9127491023014464278m_-3199718501450113841mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre>______________________________<wbr>_________________
NCSG-PC mailing list
<a class="m_-9127491023014464278m_-3199718501450113841moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is" target="_blank">NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is</a>
<a class="m_-9127491023014464278m_-3199718501450113841moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc" target="_blank">https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/<wbr>listinfo/ncsg-pc</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </div></div></div>

<br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
NCSG-PC mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is" target="_blank">NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/<wbr>listinfo/ncsg-pc</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div></div>
</div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><div><span>_______________________________________________</span><br><span>NCSG-PC mailing list</span><br><span><a href="mailto:NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is">NCSG-PC@lists.ncsg.is</a></span><br><span><a href="https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc">https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc</a></span><br></div></blockquote></body></html>